3 ms·
It’s somebody’s random blog instead of three published, peer reviewed articles. I’m not sure what you expect to hear
by bonsai_spool 4mo ago
It’s somebody’s random blog instead of three published, peer reviewed articles. I’m not sure what you expect to hear
- amanaplanacanal 4mo agoIt's a matter of law, not science. Ask a patent attorney. If you like, here is a paper from the Vanderbilt law review: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2919&context=vlr https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?a...
- bonsai_spool 4mo agoDid you actually read that article that spends many pages explaining how there is no good way for a firm to patent a repurposed drug that is working the same way as it worked in a prior indication, but is being used for a new indication where it has the same function - exactly what you’re asserting and what I said is not possible? Thanks for the article, it is a good one.