3 ms·

This shit gets me irrationally mad. Well, the existence of such content doesn't, but the fact that other people aren't disdained by it (this dogshit has almost

This shit gets me irrationally mad. Well, the existence of such content doesn't, but the fact that other people aren't disdained by it (this dogshit has almost 300 upvotes on _HN_ right now) is what gets me.

tripledry 4mo ago
As someone who doesn't follow the specifics of how LLMs write, how can you be sure it's an LLM? I'm asking this genuinely because I've been using stuff like these separators before LLMS - now someone can just say "ahh dismiss the content they used style X it's LLM, it's dogshit".
- brandnewideas 4mo ago
  That's the worst part, I'm never 100% sure, and that uncertainty is so ... disempowering?
- lhd1 4mo ago
  Look for triads and "it's not this, but that". These are dead giveaways. You can also pass it through Pangram which is quite reliable these days.
- lowdude 4mo ago
  I am not sure if I would manage to correctly identify every typical phrase, but the one I quoted I am absolutely certain of. You could try asking an LLM to write some prose about whatever you fancy. Maybe two or three different pieces, and ask it to be extra profound. You will probably see that exact sentence structure above a number of times: > It’s not [X], it’s [Y]. A bit of [A], the [random adjective] of [B], all weaving together to form [C]. A short sentence. Maybe two. A final, culminating closer, gradually transcending into space. The words are quite interchangeable, but the you will know it when you see it.
nakedneuron 4mo ago
The topic brings an interesting melange of people together. That makes up for it and made me upvote. I too noticed a shallowing of the piece somewhere in the middle. It started with an interesting observation but ended with triviality (like you'd expect from a synthetic mind without a body).
383toast 4mo ago
fwiw Pangram says 100% of the original article was written by AI

3 ms·

This shit gets me irrationally mad. Well, the existence of such content doesn't, but the fact that other people aren't disdained by it (this dogshit has almost

by brandnewideas 4mo ago

tripledry 4mo ago
As someone who doesn't follow the specifics of how LLMs write, how can you be sure it's an LLM? I'm asking this genuinely because I've been using stuff like these separators before LLMS - now someone can just say "ahh dismiss the content they used style X it's LLM, it's dogshit".
- brandnewideas 4mo ago
  That's the worst part, I'm never 100% sure, and that uncertainty is so ... disempowering?
- lhd1 4mo ago
  Look for triads and "it's not this, but that". These are dead giveaways. You can also pass it through Pangram which is quite reliable these days.
- lowdude 4mo ago
  I am not sure if I would manage to correctly identify every typical phrase, but the one I quoted I am absolutely certain of. You could try asking an LLM to write some prose about whatever you fancy. Maybe two or three different pieces, and ask it to be extra profound. You will probably see that exact sentence structure above a number of times: > It’s not [X], it’s [Y]. A bit of [A], the [random adjective] of [B], all weaving together to form [C]. A short sentence. Maybe two. A final, culminating closer, gradually transcending into space. The words are quite interchangeable, but the you will know it when you see it.
nakedneuron 4mo ago
The topic brings an interesting melange of people together. That makes up for it and made me upvote. I too noticed a shallowing of the piece somewhere in the middle. It started with an interesting observation but ended with triviality (like you'd expect from a synthetic mind without a body).
383toast 4mo ago
fwiw Pangram says 100% of the original article was written by AI