3 ms·
Humanity doesn't fully leverage the intelligence it already has, so I think people are overestimating the disruption ahead.
by CamperBob2 5mo ago
Humanity doesn't fully leverage the intelligence it already has, so I think people are overestimating the disruption ahead.
- yepyoukno 5mo agoFor sure. Intelligence is an internal human problem, not one external. I cannot see how apps doing the thinking will help the ordinary person so substantially as imaginations anticipate.
- 3edd 5mo ago[dead]
- cjbgkagh 5mo agoThat’s from a lack of intelligence not an abundance. An intelligent society would already be maximizing the productivity of its intelligent population.
- g-b-r 5mo agoIntelligence of individuals doesn't automatically translate to a society behaving intelligently
- supertroop 5mo agoDepends what country you are in. The US government seems to be averse to intelligence, whereas China fosters it. Kinda strange that the US is falling behind, I never imagined the day.
- g-b-r 5mo ago> China fosters it so long as it's not used to dissent from the government
- deleted 5mo ago[deleted]
- wartywhoa23 5mo agoDon't fall for 5D PR chess stunts. That which must be embraced in the future per certain agenda, must be made looking like it's persecuted and oppressed in the present, per any textbook on narratives.
- Terr_ 5mo ago> The intelligence it already has Makes me think of a Stephen Jay Gould quote: > "I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops."