3 ms·
Can't even be bothered greasing the article because the attention grabbing headline simply isn't true. (edit: oh it's the register, so absolute trash) It was a
by fennecbutt 4mo ago
Can't even be bothered greasing the article because the attention grabbing headline simply isn't true. (edit: oh it's the register, so absolute trash)
It was already YEARS ago that they found that certain things such as the time of year (December vs. start of January) had an impact on reasoning effort.
Until we're training models such that the undesirable human patterns aren't picked up from training data there will always be a way to prompt it to be smarter. Also look at anthropic's "assistant axis" research from a short while ago - because intelligence in a domain is relative, if I prompt it with language connected to a particular domain, use the appropriate jargon that achieves far better results.
- DangitBobby 4mo agoYou aren't missing anything except an embarrassing amount of ego on display in the article. > the techbro botlickers tend to ignore that sort of thing (admitting up front that users won't see the notice not to upgrade from 1.9 to 1.10) > Naturally, this sort of "developer" – we use the word fairly loosely here, you understand – doesn't read the code first. That would ruin the vibe, man. > You can probably guess what happened next: suddenly, there were a lot of very unhappy ChatNPCs > In his follow-up blog post this week, The Jqwik Anti-AI Affair, Link innocently (or perhaps ever so slightly disingenuously) explains: "The line was not visible when you looked at it in an emulated terminal. I added this fade-out feature because I personally do not want to see it." That's not at all nefarious huh > Oh dear. How sad. Never mind. > Prompt fondlers