4 ms·
This affects more than just Anthropic. It's a game of thrones and everyone using this technology loses. I wouldn't cheer for that.
by avaer 4mo ago
This affects more than just Anthropic. It's a game of thrones and everyone using this technology loses. I wouldn't cheer for that.
- ignoramous 4mo ago> It's a game of thrones and everyone using this technology loses Everyone? There's worlds outside of the United States government overreach.
- panny 4mo ago>everyone using this technology loses As someone not using the technology, I'm fine with that :) Intellectual property laundering was never a good thing. Glad we can begone with it.
- avaer 4mo agoThis doesn't help; customers will switch to a different model. It just means the government decides who gets to profit off of laundered IP, which is arguably even worse.
- panny 4mo agoI'm pretty sure it's the people paying for it that decide who profits off it.
- satvikpendem 4mo agoIntellectual property is not a good thing.
- beepbooptheory 4mo agoYeah but doesn't all the ai stuff kinda either way exacerbate the issues we might have with IP? Like, if it wasn't already the case that such laws are fundamentally sided with huge pools of capital who arbitrarily "own" different sequences of bytes, it certainly is now. It's like its trying to destroy intellectual property and then put this deranged hyper-financial game of energy expenditure in its place.
- deleted 4mo ago[deleted]
- ks2048 4mo agoIt appears to affect only the companies that Trump decides it should affect.
- goatlover 4mo agoWhen did conservatives abandon the free market?
- gmoore 4mo agowhen has the market ever been free?
- CamperBob2 4mo agoAn hour ago?
- ks2048 4mo agoA completely “free” market is likely incoherent, but under normal terms - probably degrading since the 1970s. And very predictable if wealth can buy you power to change the system.
- girvo 4mo agoImmediately. It's always been a smokescreen, and markets have never been truly free. Thumbs on scale, at all times.
- thatguy0900 4mo agoTrump doesn't actually stand for basically a single conservative value outside of immigration and somehow he's eaten the entire party
- mullingitover 4mo agoThe immigration-baiting isn’t even a conservative position, most of the history of conservatism has been pro-immigration. Instead it’s simply the answer to the question, “how do you convince the last vestiges of the labor unions to drink poison and vote for the people who openly plan to destroy them.”