3 ms·
I'm surprised the code has visible LLM smells. Though, I shouldn't be surprised. I hope the important bits are still human-controlled (and the same for Apple's
by LoganDark 5mo ago
I'm surprised the code has visible LLM smells. Though, I shouldn't be surprised. I hope the important bits are still human-controlled (and the same for Apple's many operating systems that absolutely deserve to remain stable and understood).
- airspeedswift 5mo agoI assure you, every inch of the interpreter code has been stared at by humans, a lot. TBH even the assembly generated by it has.
- dgellow 5mo agoFrom what I got Apple is using claude code A LOT internally
- wahnfrieden 5mo agoYes they are using Claude Code - not the Xcode agents. It worries me. I hope Codex adoption picks up there.
- andrekandre 5mo agothats a shame if true, they really should be dog-fooding that horrible agent ui in xcode to bring it up to a usable state
- wahnfrieden 5mo agoA lot of devs are tricked into using it because it’s official
- LoganDark 5mo agoI love how it doesn't even support reasoning output or edit tool diffs. (Yes it can show diffs sometimes when using the 100% official flow but not when using ACP)
- wahnfrieden 5mo agoIt also doesn't support Computer Use or Browser Use among other deficiencies
- LoganDark 5mo agoSure but the basics should be down before tackling those, and they're not.
- wahnfrieden 5mo agoYou call it solid foundations, I call it deficiency and being over a year behind state of art available elsewhere (from the same service you're already paying for)
- dcrazy 5mo agoThe UI got a massive overhaul in the new Xcode beta. It’s no longer confined to the sidebar.
- wahnfrieden 5mo agoDevs continue to be tricked by incremental updates to it. It's still deficient
- Caracas288 5mo agoIt would be interesting to see their internal guidance on LLM use. It’s a massive amount of new power that has to be wielded carefully. That kind of guidance might mean the survival or downfall of some big corps in the next few years.