4 ms·

Peter Thiel, who waged a legal war against Gawker Media after it published coverage about his business interests and personal life which upset him This is bein

by blfr 4mo ago

Peter Thiel, who waged a legal war against Gawker Media after it published coverage about his business interests and personal life which upset him This is being very economical with the facts. Gawker outed Thiel as gay against his wishes. And while the guy was in Saudi Arabia. Then they published a revenge porn tape of Hulk Hogan, which is what Thiel used to get them.

seydor 4mo ago
i remember knowing that thiel was gay before that story, and i m not even american. the sex tape was bad indeed.
caycep 4mo ago
or....was that a convenient cover story? https://medium.com/@owenthomas/gawker-peter-thiel-and-me-f80389b84fa3 https://medium.com/@owenthomas/gawker-peter-thiel-and-me-f80...
ToucanLoucan 4mo ago
Gawker outing people against their wishes, the person they outed being one of the larger avatars of the crypto-fascist right, who worked with one of the biggest co-conspirators of Vince McMahon's brutal anti-union activities to destroy them for strictly personal reasons. All of these people really deserve each other. Edit: also for bonus points, him getting outed in such a dangerous place is ironic as all hell, given that he didn't need to be there apart from wanting money out of the Saudi royal family. Like I wouldn't want to be outed while there either, but my answer is I wouldn't fucking go to Saudi Arabia with a gun to my head, and I certainly wouldn't be sucking up to the crown prince for m(b?)illions of dollars for my disinformation machine. But I guess principles are for the poors.
- wat10000 4mo ago
  You wouldn't go there, and I wouldn't go there, but he's rich, there's no real risk for him.
pavlov 4mo ago
Illiberal authoritarian monarchy is Thiel’s favorite form of government, so I’m not sure what his problem is with being outed while in Saudi Arabia.
- collingreen 4mo ago
  Thiel is firmly in the "rules for thee but not for me" camp which means any authoritarianism he isn't in control of is even worse than a democracy. Ironically many people feel this way but most just don't have the wealth to try their hand at oppression.
- smegma2 4mo ago
  [flagged]
  - newaccountman2 4mo ago
    At what point did the person to whom you are replying speak in favor of it?
newaccountman2 4mo ago
Your pointing out he was in Saudi Arabia is being very misleading with the facts. It's not like Saudi Arabia cares whether some billionaire Western businessman is gay or not. They also don't care that he's a bigot and an Islamophobe, and he doesn't care that they are Arab, outwardly Muslim, or any other thing he detests. They all worship money.
randycupertino 4mo ago
Yes Gawker was unethical and shouldn't have posted his personal details nor an illegally obtained sex tape, however billionaires shouldn't be able to destroy, censor and control media by deploying their unlimited resources to financially annihilate media outlets in endless litigation to take down reporting they don't like. Free press is already under attack in so many countries, it is dangerous that now a single rich guy can weaponize his unlimited resources to wage legal war over his own personal vendettas because his ego got hurt.

by blfr 4mo ago

seydor 4mo ago

i remember knowing that thiel was gay before that story, and i m not even american. the sex tape was bad indeed.

caycep 4mo ago

or....was that a convenient cover story? https://medium.com/@owenthomas/gawker-peter-thiel-and-me-f80389b84fa3 https://medium.com/@owenthomas/gawker-peter-thiel-and-me-f80...

ToucanLoucan 4mo ago

Gawker outing people against their wishes, the person they outed being one of the larger avatars of the crypto-fascist right, who worked with one of the biggest co-conspirators of Vince McMahon's brutal anti-union activities to destroy them for strictly personal reasons. All of these people really deserve each other. Edit: also for bonus points, him getting outed in such a dangerous place is ironic as all hell, given that he didn't need to be there apart from wanting money out of the Saudi royal family. Like I wouldn't want to be outed while there either, but my answer is I wouldn't fucking go to Saudi Arabia with a gun to my head, and I certainly wouldn't be sucking up to the crown prince for m(b?)illions of dollars for my disinformation machine. But I guess principles are for the poors.

wat10000 4mo ago
You wouldn't go there, and I wouldn't go there, but he's rich, there's no real risk for him.

pavlov 4mo ago

Illiberal authoritarian monarchy is Thiel’s favorite form of government, so I’m not sure what his problem is with being outed while in Saudi Arabia.

collingreen 4mo ago
Thiel is firmly in the "rules for thee but not for me" camp which means any authoritarianism he isn't in control of is even worse than a democracy. Ironically many people feel this way but most just don't have the wealth to try their hand at oppression.
smegma2 4mo ago
[flagged]
- newaccountman2 4mo ago
  At what point did the person to whom you are replying speak in favor of it?

newaccountman2 4mo ago

Your pointing out he was in Saudi Arabia is being very misleading with the facts. It's not like Saudi Arabia cares whether some billionaire Western businessman is gay or not. They also don't care that he's a bigot and an Islamophobe, and he doesn't care that they are Arab, outwardly Muslim, or any other thing he detests. They all worship money.

randycupertino 4mo ago

Yes Gawker was unethical and shouldn't have posted his personal details nor an illegally obtained sex tape, however billionaires shouldn't be able to destroy, censor and control media by deploying their unlimited resources to financially annihilate media outlets in endless litigation to take down reporting they don't like. Free press is already under attack in so many countries, it is dangerous that now a single rich guy can weaponize his unlimited resources to wage legal war over his own personal vendettas because his ego got hurt.