3 ms·

I've had a few similar cases, often teenagers on bikes coming dangerously close (e.g. forcing waymo to sudden break) and last one one bicyclist just blocking me

I've had a few similar cases, often teenagers on bikes coming dangerously close (e.g. forcing waymo to sudden break) and last one one bicyclist just blocking me for 5-10 minutes in SF (also just to be an asshole), with a street full of cars behind all blocked. I called the "connect to support" button and they could not anything. This is the only negative experience I had with Waymo; and I am hope something is done to be able to swiftly respond to such cases (e.g. remote driver take over, or at least capture their video and work with police to punish them later) in order to deter them in the long term.

nradov 4mo ago
You've got to be kidding. SF police and prosecutors barely do anything about real crimes, never mind blocking a road for a few minutes.
- rsingel 4mo ago
  Actually blocking a road in SF can get you a felony conspiracy count with this DA, especially if they don't like your message San Francisco’s Case Against Pro-Palestinian Activists Who Blocked Bridge Heads to Jury | KQED https://share.google/4RstsRSYbqY2lEdhn https://share.google/4RstsRSYbqY2lEdhn
  - freediddy 4mo ago
    They blocked the Golden Gate Bridge which included ambulances, other emergency vehicles and thousands of people trying to get to work. I'm happy that the DA is throwing the book at them, I hope they bankrupt themselves trying to defend themselves and then spend a lot of time in jail.
    - trhway 4mo ago
      While politically i'm on the opposite side of those guys, i do think that such severe prosecution is unwarranted and politically motivated (and may be intended to create chilling effect on all future protests no matter the cause) - blocking a road is a well established traditional form of protest which traditionally is expected to end with (if the judge is in a bad mood) something like disorderly conduct citation/fine, not anywhere close to felony.
      - crubier 4mo ago
        Absolutely not. At the VERY least, the road blockers should be fined the cost they caused to society. Block Golden gate bridge for 1h30min for 10,000 people (Avg salary $50/h)? That will be 1.5 * 10,000 * 50 = $750,000 damage.
        parkoor 4mo ago
        [flagged]
        trhway 4mo ago
        Well, if they caused you any specific loss nothing prevents you from suing them in civil court like in any other situation when somebody causes you a specific loss. That though is a completely different thing from criminal prosecution.
        kortilla 4mo ago
        And if someone died in ambulance that couldn’t get to a hospital in time?
        trhway 4mo ago
        you're talking hypotheticals while in real life for example: "A Waymo self-driving car blocked a road near a deadly fire, hindering first responders. " https://www.youtube.com/shorts/6uhcVYhmULU https://www.youtube.com/shorts/6uhcVYhmULU "Waymos blocked roads and caused chaos during San Francisco power outage" https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/waymo-san-francisco-power-outage/4002009/ https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/waymo-san-francisco-po... Waymo and specific people there responsible for that programming/bugs could probably be charged with criminal negligence by an enthusiastic prosecutor, yet haven't been. Why? Probably common sense. Like recognizing that there weren't criminal intent. And such situations is a price of progress. The same with protests. They weren't conspiring to block ambulances. And such situations is a price of freedom of protests and speech. Though if somebody dies that way, i think they would have a civil case against the protesters. The same way like affected people can have a civil case against Waymo in the situations mentioned above.
    - text0404 4mo ago
      Except the defense has shown that the police blocked opening an additional lane even after the protestors specifically requested it for emergency traffic, and in fact blocked more lanes unnecessarily. > Defense attorneys argued that many of the risks to people stuck in traffic could have been mitigated — including the traffic itself — if the median had been moved to open a fourth lane on the southbound side. They said a protester designated to communicate with the CHP specifically asked for that to happen to allow emergency vehicles to access anyone who needed one. > Northbound traffic was also stopped by the CHP as a multitude of emergency vehicles responded to the bridge, which defense attorneys pointed out would have created the same type of risks the prosecution said people were experiencing because of the protesters. https://localnewsmatters.org/2026/05/29/gaza-protesters-golden-gate-bridge-trial/ https://localnewsmatters.org/2026/05/29/gaza-protesters-gold...
    - deleted 4mo ago
      [deleted]
    - righthand 4mo ago
      [flagged]
      - hereweare26 4mo ago
        [flagged]
- liarpantsfire0 4mo ago
  [dead]
- tudelo 4mo ago
  People will reply to you calling you crazy, but SF/bay is the only place I have ever experienced where many people will literally leave their cars unlocked because a broken window isn't worth the hassle. Yes, locking your parked car is a hazard here... and the reason is obvious.
  - mathattack 4mo ago
    I couldn’t believe this the first time I heard it. This isn’t new, it goes back to the 90s. Perhaps longer.
    - throwworhtthrow 4mo ago
      In the 70s in SF my father had his car window broken by someone who wanted to steal his parking space. He found his car pushed in front of an adjacent driveway, and ticketed. His doors were unlocked the whole time...
  - viking123 4mo ago
    When I read this kind of stuff I am always happy I live in a normal country/place - Singapore. Absolutely insane lmao. Must be fun sitting in your Waymo hitting some panic button and it gets blocked LMAO
    - shafyy 4mo ago
      Singapore is a highly authoritarian place where caning is legal punishment. I would not call this normal, but rather "absolutely insane lmao".
      - aprilthird2021 4mo ago
        I live in SF and I absolutely love so much about it, but here and especially in Oakland where I also lived for years, I'd welcome bringing back caning if it meant we could live as safely and securely as in Singapore
slim 4mo ago
can't you get your head out of the window and yell at him ? serious question, not sure if you can even open the window on thes cars

nradov 4mo ago

You've got to be kidding. SF police and prosecutors barely do anything about real crimes, never mind blocking a road for a few minutes.

rsingel 4mo ago
Actually blocking a road in SF can get you a felony conspiracy count with this DA, especially if they don't like your message San Francisco’s Case Against Pro-Palestinian Activists Who Blocked Bridge Heads to Jury | KQED https://share.google/4RstsRSYbqY2lEdhn https://share.google/4RstsRSYbqY2lEdhn
- freediddy 4mo ago
  They blocked the Golden Gate Bridge which included ambulances, other emergency vehicles and thousands of people trying to get to work. I'm happy that the DA is throwing the book at them, I hope they bankrupt themselves trying to defend themselves and then spend a lot of time in jail.
  - trhway 4mo ago
    While politically i'm on the opposite side of those guys, i do think that such severe prosecution is unwarranted and politically motivated (and may be intended to create chilling effect on all future protests no matter the cause) - blocking a road is a well established traditional form of protest which traditionally is expected to end with (if the judge is in a bad mood) something like disorderly conduct citation/fine, not anywhere close to felony.
    - crubier 4mo ago
      Absolutely not. At the VERY least, the road blockers should be fined the cost they caused to society. Block Golden gate bridge for 1h30min for 10,000 people (Avg salary $50/h)? That will be 1.5 * 10,000 * 50 = $750,000 damage.
      - parkoor 4mo ago
        [flagged]
      - trhway 4mo ago
        Well, if they caused you any specific loss nothing prevents you from suing them in civil court like in any other situation when somebody causes you a specific loss. That though is a completely different thing from criminal prosecution.
        kortilla 4mo ago
        And if someone died in ambulance that couldn’t get to a hospital in time?
        trhway 4mo ago
        you're talking hypotheticals while in real life for example: "A Waymo self-driving car blocked a road near a deadly fire, hindering first responders. " https://www.youtube.com/shorts/6uhcVYhmULU https://www.youtube.com/shorts/6uhcVYhmULU "Waymos blocked roads and caused chaos during San Francisco power outage" https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/waymo-san-francisco-power-outage/4002009/ https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/waymo-san-francisco-po... Waymo and specific people there responsible for that programming/bugs could probably be charged with criminal negligence by an enthusiastic prosecutor, yet haven't been. Why? Probably common sense. Like recognizing that there weren't criminal intent. And such situations is a price of progress. The same with protests. They weren't conspiring to block ambulances. And such situations is a price of freedom of protests and speech. Though if somebody dies that way, i think they would have a civil case against the protesters. The same way like affected people can have a civil case against Waymo in the situations mentioned above.
  - text0404 4mo ago
    Except the defense has shown that the police blocked opening an additional lane even after the protestors specifically requested it for emergency traffic, and in fact blocked more lanes unnecessarily. > Defense attorneys argued that many of the risks to people stuck in traffic could have been mitigated — including the traffic itself — if the median had been moved to open a fourth lane on the southbound side. They said a protester designated to communicate with the CHP specifically asked for that to happen to allow emergency vehicles to access anyone who needed one. > Northbound traffic was also stopped by the CHP as a multitude of emergency vehicles responded to the bridge, which defense attorneys pointed out would have created the same type of risks the prosecution said people were experiencing because of the protesters. https://localnewsmatters.org/2026/05/29/gaza-protesters-golden-gate-bridge-trial/ https://localnewsmatters.org/2026/05/29/gaza-protesters-gold...
  - deleted 4mo ago
    [deleted]
  - righthand 4mo ago
    [flagged]
    - hereweare26 4mo ago
      [flagged]
liarpantsfire0 4mo ago
[dead]
tudelo 4mo ago
People will reply to you calling you crazy, but SF/bay is the only place I have ever experienced where many people will literally leave their cars unlocked because a broken window isn't worth the hassle. Yes, locking your parked car is a hazard here... and the reason is obvious.
- mathattack 4mo ago
  I couldn’t believe this the first time I heard it. This isn’t new, it goes back to the 90s. Perhaps longer.
  - throwworhtthrow 4mo ago
    In the 70s in SF my father had his car window broken by someone who wanted to steal his parking space. He found his car pushed in front of an adjacent driveway, and ticketed. His doors were unlocked the whole time...
- viking123 4mo ago
  When I read this kind of stuff I am always happy I live in a normal country/place - Singapore. Absolutely insane lmao. Must be fun sitting in your Waymo hitting some panic button and it gets blocked LMAO
  - shafyy 4mo ago
    Singapore is a highly authoritarian place where caning is legal punishment. I would not call this normal, but rather "absolutely insane lmao".
    - aprilthird2021 4mo ago
      I live in SF and I absolutely love so much about it, but here and especially in Oakland where I also lived for years, I'd welcome bringing back caning if it meant we could live as safely and securely as in Singapore

slim 4mo ago

can't you get your head out of the window and yell at him ? serious question, not sure if you can even open the window on thes cars