3 ms·
They were reviewing perf designations, then pulling up PR count, then arguing against designation based on the number of PRs opened.
by tyre 4mo ago
They were reviewing perf designations, then pulling up PR count, then arguing against designation based on the number of PRs opened.
- MarkusQ 4mo agoThat still doesn't clarify: were they saying "many PRs→good" or "many PRs→bad" or "number of PRs is irrelevant" or...?
- tyre 4mo agoThat PRs == impact.
- QuercusMax 4mo agoWait, PRs opened? Wouldn't merged make more sense?