3 ms·
test_sum is assumedly relatively trivial. So as a lay person I’d expect some sort of obviousness test to apply. Like so much of the stuff in the Google/Oracle l
by MBCook 4mo ago
test_sum is assumedly relatively trivial. So as a lay person I’d expect some sort of obviousness test to apply. Like so much of the stuff in the Google/Oracle lawsuit.
But if you take all the individual tests used to test git as a whole, that seems far more unique. Seems like at that point you’re really having to duplicate the actual git internals, and that seems like it should be covered.
- joshka 4mo ago> test_sum is assumedly relatively trivial. So as a lay person I’d expect some sort of obviousness test to apply. Like so much of the stuff in the Google/Oracle lawsuit. Feel free to extrapolate to the threshold where it's not and at that point apply. > you’re really having to duplicate the actual git internals Copyright covers the expression, not the method. So the Rust function: fn sum(a: u8, b: u8) { a + b } is distinct from the C function: int sum(int a, int b) { return a + b; }