10 ms·
I agree, this looks like their plan to wane out subscriptions. This will probably come with Opus nerfs later.
by xpct 4mo ago
I agree, this looks like their plan to wane out subscriptions. This will probably come with Opus nerfs later.
- taormina 4mo agoThose already landed! Oh, you weren't talking about 4.8?
- piva00 4mo agoEven Opus 4.7 felt like a regression from 4.6, consumed a lot more tokens while I didn't experience any substantial improvements. The company I work at simply rolled back to 4.6 on everyone's configurations, disabling the toggle for 4.7.
- taormina 4mo ago4.6 has been my happy place for getting anything done for a while now.
- nonethewiser 4mo agoIt's possible that they will transition to usage credits but why not take them at their word? To date they have continued to offer better and better models to their subscription plans.
- timcobb 4mo agoWhat's their word? Have they commented? Upd: I meant big picture, not with respect to this model release. Where do subscriptions figure into their strategic vision. Will consumers end up paying enterprise prices in the future?
- ls612 4mo agoIn TFA they say they intend to restore Fable 5 to subscription plans some time after June 22. That is what "take them at their word" means.
- KyleJune 4mo agoIn the blog post they say when sufficient capacity allows them to do so they aim to restore Fable 5 as a standart part of subscription plans and intend to do so as quickly as they can.
- dbbk 4mo agoRead it again
- xvector 4mo agoHN needs to take a chill pill. Could it be that Mythos is expensive and they just want to give people a taste of it? I mean the alternative is not offering it at all?
- 8note 4mo agoits unclear how they can offer it broadly but only for half a month. why do they have capacity now that they wont in a few weeks?
- bigtechennui 4mo agoIt’s offered broadly after, for more money. It’s subsidized as marketing
- losvedir 4mo agoBreak between training runs?
- rapind 4mo agoI just assume Opus is constantly nerfed based on capacity. I was exclusively Claude for a long time, but the inconsistency in quality, constant outages, and slow downs were too hard to work with. I just use dumb and fast models now. I'm more engaged. I think that the higher the quality of the model, the more you tend to vibe with it, and then the more hallucinations you then miss. I'm not sure which is more productive, but I definitely burn out faster the more I vibe. At some point you're spending your time on forums, discord, or youtube instead of engaged with what you're building. Or you yak shave about your tooling and end up creating the 600th multi-agent gastown harness and blowing thousands of dollars on tokens to create it only to discover it's too expense to actually use.
- winter_blue 4mo agoComposer 2.5 Fast that Cursor is giving away for very little has been amazing.
- daviding 4mo agoGiven the Fable 5 costs it's getting tricker to weight up 'how smart do you want it', like looking at the top of this graph.. https://cursor.com/evals https://cursor.com/evals
- aplomb1026 4mo ago[flagged]
- dylandevelops 4mo agoI agree with you. The more I vibe code, the less interested I feel in what I'm building. Working with models that force me to think, especially with personal projects, helps me stay engaged and enjoy what I am doing more.