> If they wanted a time limit, they could have put it in the contract, or not signed the contract. Most contracts are legally mandated to have time limits. I

> If they wanted a time limit, they could have put it in the contract, or not signed the contract. Most contracts are legally mandated to have time limits. I think that's a good policy. In this case an explicit number of years it has to stay a park would probably work better than an attempt at indefinitely defining the land.