3 ms·
At my employer, if AI is not used, it shows up on your performance report and you’ll be told if you don’t start using it, you will be dismissed. I work at a med
by block_dagger 4mo ago
At my employer, if AI is not used, it shows up on your performance report and you’ll be told if you don’t start using it, you will be dismissed. I work at a medium sized successful YC-backed SaaS. So here, the attribution is meaningless - they look at your Bedrock and LLM API calls as well as Claude Code history.
- fragmede 4mo agoDo you fellow ICs have access to those reports and can correlate commits from you to the prompts used to create them easily?
- block_dagger 4mo agoNot currently. Each IC's report is kept private unless they voluntarily share it, and IC's don't have visibility into other IC's Claude Code or Cursor logs. I think we're moving toward a model where it will be easier to correlate commits with chats, but timeline is not clear.
- fragmede 4mo agoSeems far more efficient to just have a line the commit message then.
- Aurornis 4mo agoIf the company policy is to have everyone using it then everyone is going to assume you're using it. I don't see a need for an attribution line in this case.
- vips7L 4mo agohttps://github.com/dtnewman/burn-baby-burn https://github.com/dtnewman/burn-baby-burn
- ethagnawl 4mo ago> they look at your Bedrock and LLM API calls as well as Claude Code history. This is fucking insane. How does this correlate with productivity in any way? The results are all that matters, who cares how you got there?
- andrekandre 4mo ago> The results are all that matters, who cares how you got there? i actually said this at $JOB to a manager, to which they replied "yes, but in the future all code will be ai generated, so thats the 'results' we are looking for"....