3 ms·

The number of times those get grabbed of someone’s face and stomped on will be greater than zero. And businesses will have signs for No guns/spyglasses.

hallway_monitor 4mo ago
At what point does civil disobedience become justified? Expected even? Also let's be clear - this is not violence, not assault, it is simple destruction of property.
- evilduck 4mo ago
  I don't think you could plausibly do this and only catch a property crime charge. If you're caught, forcefully removing worn objects from another person will almost certainly catch you a misdemeanor battery charge in most US jurisdictions. I'm no lawyer and things vary by location, but clothing is generally considered an extension of the person and usually touching their worn objects constitutes physical contact with the person themselves. Doing so with intent of committing criminal mischief, vandalism, or felony property damage will get all of them thrown at you. If you hastily do so and happen to harm the person in the process (since you're naturally grabbing at someone's eyes, that seems like a serious risk), there's a good chance you'll be given an aggravated or felony battery charge instead.
  - ChicagoDave 4mo ago
    If it’s a woman slapping them off a pervert and accidentally stepping on them, 100% walks no charges.
    - evilduck 4mo ago
      Mostly because perverts tend not to press charges when they're confronted, not because they wouldn't have legal standing. Also your scenario is clearly not what I was replying to about civil disobedience.
1234letshaveatw 4mo ago
The number of times the grabber gets a beatdown will be equivalent, signs will be ignored
llbbdd 4mo ago
Real tough guy hours
ncr100 4mo ago
Capturing the faces of every small child at a playground, by a creeper who's just standing outside the fence, looking onto the inside... Imagine that, this weekend. Brought to you by Meta Smart Glasses
browsingonly 4mo ago
Not when cops are wearing them. Cops with these that have the day's BOLO and warrant hotlist loaded on them will be the new hot ALPR.

hallway_monitor 4mo ago

At what point does civil disobedience become justified? Expected even? Also let's be clear - this is not violence, not assault, it is simple destruction of property.

evilduck 4mo ago
I don't think you could plausibly do this and only catch a property crime charge. If you're caught, forcefully removing worn objects from another person will almost certainly catch you a misdemeanor battery charge in most US jurisdictions. I'm no lawyer and things vary by location, but clothing is generally considered an extension of the person and usually touching their worn objects constitutes physical contact with the person themselves. Doing so with intent of committing criminal mischief, vandalism, or felony property damage will get all of them thrown at you. If you hastily do so and happen to harm the person in the process (since you're naturally grabbing at someone's eyes, that seems like a serious risk), there's a good chance you'll be given an aggravated or felony battery charge instead.
- ChicagoDave 4mo ago
  If it’s a woman slapping them off a pervert and accidentally stepping on them, 100% walks no charges.
  - evilduck 4mo ago
    Mostly because perverts tend not to press charges when they're confronted, not because they wouldn't have legal standing. Also your scenario is clearly not what I was replying to about civil disobedience.

1234letshaveatw 4mo ago

The number of times the grabber gets a beatdown will be equivalent, signs will be ignored

llbbdd 4mo ago

Real tough guy hours

ncr100 4mo ago

Capturing the faces of every small child at a playground, by a creeper who's just standing outside the fence, looking onto the inside... Imagine that, this weekend. Brought to you by Meta Smart Glasses

browsingonly 4mo ago

Not when cops are wearing them. Cops with these that have the day's BOLO and warrant hotlist loaded on them will be the new hot ALPR.