3 ms·
Using raw uncompressed bitrate is a bit disingenuous. How about comparing an older, widely supported codec like H.264 as a baseline?
by Ecco 4mo ago
Using raw uncompressed bitrate is a bit disingenuous. How about comparing an older, widely supported codec like H.264 as a baseline?
- overfeed 4mo ago> Using raw uncompressed bitrate is a bit disingenuous It is not disingenuous given the context. Gp was responding to ggp's hypothetical: >> Is there a compelling reason encoding needs to be done locally?
- gblargg 4mo agoIf you compressed it with H.264, it wouldn't make much sense to send it remotely to be encoded with a better codec.
- Dylan16807 4mo agoWhy not? If h.264 is the best you can do with minimal resources, you can give it 5x the final bitrate and send it to a specialized/beefy encoding system to become something better.