3 ms·

Both companies don't mind weaponization. The difference is whether it should only be domestic. Both are ok with foreigners being bombed.

• DonsDiscountGas 5mo ago
  That aligns with average human values
• ethbr1 5mo ago
  Do you have a citation for that? Because the Anthropic's presentation of their position doesn't have a domestic or foreign caveat to autonomous weapons. It's a categorical no. https://www.anthropic.com/news/statement-department-of-war https://www.anthropic.com/news/statement-department-of-war
  • amazingamazing 5mo ago
    > We support the use of AI for lawful foreign intelligence and counterintelligence missions. But using these systems for mass domestic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values. Your link
    • ethbr1 5mo ago
      Yes. They draw that distinction on intelligence. I was asking about autonomous weapons. >> Both companies don't mind weaponization. The difference is whether it should only be domestic. Both are ok with foreigners being bombed.