4 ms·
I find arguing that a complex weighted graph has a taste is interesting. This is not a jab, but a genuine curiosity of mine.
by bayindirh 5mo ago
I find arguing that a complex weighted graph has a taste is interesting.
This is not a jab, but a genuine curiosity of mine.
- knollimar 5mo agoThe roulette pockets for the model are bigger for some outputs than others. Draw a big enough black box around it and a different one around humans and it's insistinguishable.
- alstonite 5mo agoThe taste that the complex weighted graph was trained on was better for one than the other I think is the long winded way to say it
- patmorgan23 5mo ago[dead]
- chronofar 5mo agoMore interesting than arguing a jumble of electrochemical reactions have taste? That may seem more readily familiar but is no less strange if you prod at it. Nonetheless it’s difficult to argue either don’t produce output that has qualities of discernment (ie taste).
- jmcodes 5mo agoIsn't it just arguing that one complex weighted graph was tuned to output tokens that more align with what current day users would define as 'taste'? I don't think it necessarily says anything about a model itself having 'taste' in some subjective way. If the fashion changes would the model update with it without retraining? No. So the model doesn't have 'taste' in that sense. It has alignment to current human definitions of taste.
- meowface 5mo agoIt is more capable of writing code I find tasteful and maintainable. It is debatable to what extent it itself has taste. Its outputs just suit my taste more than Codex's do, even though Codex introduces fewer bugs.