4 ms·
> Being a U.S. ally is no guarantee of protection even if you literally host American bases like the gulf countries are seeing. In fact, it’s only made them a t
by bawolff 5mo ago
> Being a U.S. ally is no guarantee of protection even if you literally host American bases like the gulf countries are seeing. In fact, it’s only made them a target and the U.S. prioritized protecting Israel entirely over protecting any of the Gulf states.
I think that is a little oversimplified. America did spend resources on defense of gulf states. They might feel it wasn't enough but it definitely wasn't nothing. I imagine defending Israel was probably a fair bit easier given the distance from Iran, and their domestic military being a lot more prepared and practised for missile defense, which may have translated to more effective results. Ultimately though i think there is a limit to how much America can reasonable do on defense once something like that starts.
Probably the thing gulf states could most reasonably be pissed about was starting the whole adventure in the first place without much regard for the fairly predictable consequences.
- GJim 5mo ago> America did spend resources on defense of gulf states. No offence mate, but did you miss the bit about the USA starting the war?
- 05hundred 5mo agoConsidering the last sentence in the comment you are replying to, i doubt they missed it...
- GJim 5mo agoTheir use of the word "probably" rather suggests they did miss it. By a country mile.
- pirates 5mo agoNo, I think you missed it by a country mile. “Probably” was meant in the sense of “out of all the things the gulf states have reason to be mad at the US about, starting the conflict is ‘probably’ (obviously, lol) the thing they’re most unhappy with”. They weren’t saying the US “probably” started the conflict.
- GJim 5mo ago>‘probably’ (obviously, lol) My point precisely.
- awfawfatgeatg 5mo ago[flagged]