4 ms·

if the content is sufficiently good, why does it matter that it is ai or not?

• cvoss 5mo ago
  It matters because of the inability to measure up front whether the content is sufficiently good. AI's best skill is making something look right and look good when it is, in fact, not right. It does this all the time, as opposed to human-made things, which are like that only for specific attempts at deception.
  • datsci_est_2015 5mo ago
    I see it as previously content could be categorized as: - Clearly amateurish production, which should be met with skepticism until proven otherwise - Clearly professional production, with good reputation (e.g. long-running with few controversies), meaning it’s probably trustworthy - Clearly professional, with poor reputation (e.g. propaganda funding), meaning one should be skeptical while consuming But now the bar for “appearing professional” has changed, and it’s not as easy to differentiate between trustworthy and untrustworthy new sources.
• vintermann 5mo ago
  I'm starting to suspect a lot of the people saying things like this have a plan to get rich from AI content farming. It's really not hard to understand what the problem is with AI generated history vids.
• Ajedi32 5mo ago
  For pure entertainment maybe, but in the case of a history video how do you know whether the history you're being presented is accurate, or even has any basis in reality for that matter?
• sixothree 5mo ago
  I honestly think your questions has more profound implications than other responders seem to appreciate. I think a correlating answer can be found in visual effects for movies. And the answer "depends". When it's poorly done, the scene feels off or unbelievable somehow. But when done well, people have an enjoyable experience. This same conversation existed when moving from practical effects to digital. and in the end, audiences only cared about quality.