5 ms·
Or a really cool scuba diving weight belt.
by nradov 5mo ago
Or a really cool scuba diving weight belt.
- DonHopkins 5mo agoOr a huge gold statue of Trump and Epstein partying and raping children.
- buildsjets 5mo agoIt is our fiduciary responsibility to put this resource to it's highest and best use.
- GuestFAUniverse 5mo agoBlack humor. Or isn't anyone allowed anymore to mention "Black" in the context of Epstein?
- rbanffy 5mo agoI prefer “dark humour”. After all, it allows some colours to come through.
- dominicrose 5mo agoDonald Trump Wants His Blue Blazer "Black" | Friends
- cindyllm 5mo ago[dead]
- sys32768 5mo ago^ This person jokes about raping children.
- buildsjets 5mo agoDonald Trump has aided and abbeted the rape of children, is actively preventing child rapists from being prosecuted, and has set up a multi-billion dollar legal defense fund to protect his criminal associates. And what offends you is that someone made a joke to point that out? Pathetic. You should be offended by the criminals, not the clowns.
- manarth 5mo agoMore like 20+ weight belts, you go underwater with a 280kg weight belt you're not coming back!
- yawpitch 5mo agoTechnically that depends on how much water you and the gold displace.
- manarth 5mo agoI'm a scuba instructor so for giggles I did the maths! Based on these densities: Gold Density: 19.32 g/cm3 Lead Density: 11.34 g/cm3 We now need to understand how much water is displaced by a kg. Gold volume: (1,000 / 19.32) ≈ 51.75 cm3 Lead volume: (1,000 / 11.34) ≈ 88.18 cm3 1kg of gold displaces 51.75 cm3 of water. 1kg of lead displaces 88.18 cm3 of water. Fresh water: 1000 g/litre Salt water: 1025 g/litre In fresh water: 1kg gold = (1000g negative buoyancy - 52g water displacement) = 9948g negative buoyancy 1kg lead = (1000g negative buoyancy - 88g water displacement) = 9912g negative buoyancy In salt water: 1kg gold = (1000g negative buoyancy - 53g water displacement) = 9947g negative buoyancy 1kg lead = (1000g negative buoyancy - 90g water displacement) = 9910g negative buoyancy As a scuba-diving weight, gold is less than 1% more efficient (by weight) than lead. It's counter-intuitive: gold is nearly twice as dense as lead, but the importance in scuba diving is the weight of the, er, "weight", vs the weight of the water it displaces (Archimedes principle). Gold weights per kilo are a tiny amount more efficient than lead per kilo, but much smaller and much sparklier. Anyone who wants to donate me a gold weight-belt, please be assured I would display it to its full magnificance. Around 8kg would be fine :-)