4 ms·

People work 5 days a week because of protracted violent strikes by unions and socialist revolutionaries forcing governments to recognize labor rights. Prior to

by krapp 5mo ago

People work 5 days a week because of protracted violent strikes by unions and socialist revolutionaries forcing governments to recognize labor rights. Prior to that the norm was working 7 days a week, sunup to sundown, with only Christmas off, from adolescence until you died.

11101010010001 5mo ago
SEs would rather play many player versions of the prisoner's dilemma than unionize.
lofties 5mo ago
You're right. We need to bring back protracted violent strikes by unions and socialists!
- zasz 5mo ago
  You know the ones bringing most of the violence were the state and private goons hired by capitalists, right?
- babelfish 5mo ago
  When rights are equal, force wins. This is true for either the worker or the employer. Hence why employers frequently employed private firms to commit said violence on unions.
zeroonetwothree 5mo ago
Not really true but it’s a nice story
- krapp 5mo ago
  It's a nice story and it's true. Weekends, sick days, vacation days, being paid in legal tender and not company scrip, maternity leave, safety regulations, disabled affordance, banning child labor, civil rights and womens' rights (while they lasted) and the minimum wage. All due to socialist activism and a non-zero amount of violence.
  - deleted 5mo ago
    [deleted]
  - kakacik 5mo ago
    Hold your socialist jihad propaganda a bit off, sundays were definitely off days for festivities, visiting church etc. Definitely all over Europe, its still frowned upon in many places to do any amount of ie house work during sundays.
  - cucumber3732842 5mo ago
    Banning child labor is literally the "I'm helping" meme but for government. Child went away mostly on its own (as did labor by the disabled) because industrialization made all that non-competitive compared to a normal adult operating some machine. Then, once child labor was relegated to a few niches of limited overall economic importance the government showed up and banned it to win a few brownie points from some jerks. Child labor isn't a success of some socialists 100yr ago. It's a success of some propagandists 100yr ago.

by krapp 5mo ago

11101010010001 5mo ago

SEs would rather play many player versions of the prisoner's dilemma than unionize.

lofties 5mo ago

You're right. We need to bring back protracted violent strikes by unions and socialists!

zasz 5mo ago
You know the ones bringing most of the violence were the state and private goons hired by capitalists, right?
babelfish 5mo ago
When rights are equal, force wins. This is true for either the worker or the employer. Hence why employers frequently employed private firms to commit said violence on unions.

zeroonetwothree 5mo ago

Not really true but it’s a nice story

krapp 5mo ago
It's a nice story and it's true. Weekends, sick days, vacation days, being paid in legal tender and not company scrip, maternity leave, safety regulations, disabled affordance, banning child labor, civil rights and womens' rights (while they lasted) and the minimum wage. All due to socialist activism and a non-zero amount of violence.
- deleted 5mo ago
  [deleted]
- kakacik 5mo ago
  Hold your socialist jihad propaganda a bit off, sundays were definitely off days for festivities, visiting church etc. Definitely all over Europe, its still frowned upon in many places to do any amount of ie house work during sundays.
- cucumber3732842 5mo ago
  Banning child labor is literally the "I'm helping" meme but for government. Child went away mostly on its own (as did labor by the disabled) because industrialization made all that non-competitive compared to a normal adult operating some machine. Then, once child labor was relegated to a few niches of limited overall economic importance the government showed up and banned it to win a few brownie points from some jerks. Child labor isn't a success of some socialists 100yr ago. It's a success of some propagandists 100yr ago.