2 ms·
I thought it was pretty well-established that conspiracists aren't deterred with facts, and that their commitments to the conspiracy theory are essentially emot
by abalashov 5mo ago
I thought it was pretty well-established that conspiracists aren't deterred with facts, and that their commitments to the conspiracy theory are essentially emotional and/or in-group identitarian?
- georgeecollins 5mo agoYou should definitely listen to this podcast which is an interview with a Professor of Psychology at Columbia. He also thought what you thought-- that you can't convince a Q-Anon type-- and they were actually testing something else. When they found out that 25% of people who believed conspiracy theories actually changed their mind after three exchanges with an LLM. They repeated the test and the results were replicable. (But still only about 25%, but that is something.) This made me think: I grew up in a world where there was a flawed but consensus view of the world, its problems, institutions motivations. This came from a common mass media. Maybe getting our answers from AI will lead us to a new (inevitably flawed or even bad) consensus. Weird. Source: https://play.cdnstream1.com/s/kcrw/question-everything/can-a-chatbot-convince-c-4cc36b https://play.cdnstream1.com/s/kcrw/question-everything/can-a...
- abalashov 5mo agoVery interesting. Thank you for that, and I say so with due recognition that my response wasn't really aimed at the central idea of your comment. Thank you for humouring it anyway!