3 ms·
Someone does that to me and they go on the spreadsheet and I work around them every time in future. It's not worth interacting with those people.
by cryo32 5mo ago
Someone does that to me and they go on the spreadsheet and I work around them every time in future. It's not worth interacting with those people.
- gib444 5mo agoWhen your spreadsheet gets full, will you change jobs or change tactic?
- cryo32 5mo agoI'll have a peaceful life until it gets to my yearly management review of my teams.
- lionkor 5mo agoI get that this is supposed to be unproductive snark, but the real answer is probably to then sort the spreadsheet and assign a tier system of how annoying and useless each person in it is.
- glaslong 5mo agoWe need to go deeper: ELO and matchmaking to keep the most annoying coworkers contained playing with each other
- gib444 5mo agoIt was not snark (an uncharitable read I must say). The point was everyone is being forced to use AI. So keeping a shitlist is going to be a very, very short term solution.
- lionkor 5mo ago> everyone is being forced to use AI Some small subset of companies are doing this, not all companies.
- deleted 5mo ago[deleted]
- jjgreen 5mo agoSwitch to a DB
- masfuerte 5mo agoThat seems like a lot of bother. If I hit the 1,048,576 row limit I'd start a new column.
- kgwxd 5mo agoI think they own the company at that point.
- hsbauauvhabzb 5mo agoOption B would involve being incredibly verbose and burying prompt injections in your question.
- compass_copium 5mo agoThe sabot of the AI era. Love it.
- hnthrow0287345 5mo agoThat's probably the goal You get nothing being the go-to person vs. the person that just does the job
- layer8 5mo agoYou might get fired for still using spreadsheets. ;)
- cryo32 5mo agoHa. I refer back to my previous comment https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48278108 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48278108