2 ms·

If a tool had been replaced by a better tool, wouldn't it be natural to discuss that?

• FpUser 4mo ago
  First - the tool in question had not been replaced. Second -discussion based on merits is one thing. Holy war is something totally different. Personally I do not consider Rust to be a better tool but it does not matter. Each one is free to drink their own poison. I do not get obsessed about screwdrivers and I have used many.
  • tcfhgj 4mo ago
    In many instances the tool has been replaced.
    • willtemperley 4mo ago
      You have written a glib and low effort reply to anything that disagrees with your Rust-maximal worldview. The sheer immaturity of Rust devs is enough to put me off the language.
      • bulbar 4mo ago
        That's actually a common pattern and to me that's a bit off-putting as well. I have seen examples where some opinion gets momentum and it's repeated over and over again on the Internet even though the merit is very questionable. Haven't looked enough into Rust to form an opinion though.
        • deleted 4mo ago
          [deleted]
        • tcfhgj 4mo ago
          I haven't voiced an opinion, but a fact. Otherwise, I don't respond to (imo) obvious provocations from questionable motives.