3 ms·
CISA said “there is no indication that any sensitive data was compromised as a result of the incident.” Oh wow. Except for those secrets.
by m3047 5mo ago
CISA said “there is no indication that any sensitive data was compromised as a result of the incident.”
Oh wow. Except for those secrets.
- InsideOutSanta 5mo agoExcept for all the leaked data, absolutely no data was leaked.
- hsbauauvhabzb 5mo agoSee the trick is to not consider your data sensitive, no SENSITIVE data was leaked.
- Terr_ 5mo agoThere is no data leakage from the application where the front-fell-off, because we towed the data outside the environment. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3m5qxZm_JqM https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3m5qxZm_JqM
- hsbauauvhabzb 5mo ago‘Logs do not indicate hackers access any sensitive data, because we did not implement logging and did not look very hard for auxiliary evidence’
- shakna 5mo agoWell, "Sensitive" is the second lowest data label. It must all just be above that.
- unethical_ban 5mo agoDidn't RTFA, was any actual secret data or any IOC, log tampering, etc. found?
- bandrami 5mo agoUnfortunately "sensitive" has a specific meaning that they may be being legalistic with. PII, for example, is generally not "sensitive".
- oofbey 5mo agoWillful ignorance. "No indication" meaning they haven't seen any evidence anything was compromised. Could be because they've been working very hard not to look at any evidence or analysis of what happened. "I'm not aware of X" is very different from "X is not true".
- stephbook 5mo agoThey probably don't have systems in place to even detect that data was snorkeled off. So "no indication" is completely correct.