3 ms·

> LLM-powered vaccine development Good lord! I hope somebody is documenting all these bombastic LLM-related public statements. They're going to be a neverendi

> LLM-powered vaccine development Good lord! I hope somebody is documenting all these bombastic LLM-related public statements. They're going to be a neverending source of cringe and laughs for the next 50 years. (I've heard one C-level dude say with a straight face that LLMs were a "more significant invention than writing".)

esseph 5mo ago
> Good lord! >I hope somebody is documenting all these bombastic LLM-related public statements. --- This has been in use for awhile. https://academic.oup.com/bib/article/26/3/bbaf263/8158336 https://academic.oup.com/bib/article/26/3/bbaf263/8158336 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12970898/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12970898/ How it gets used: https://mlconference.ai/blog/ai-in-vaccine-development/ https://mlconference.ai/blog/ai-in-vaccine-development/
- otabdeveloper4 5mo ago
  No, you cannot use LLMs to develop vaccines. Anybody who claims otherwise is lying to you. Also, you're confusing "AI" and LLMs.
  - deleted 5mo ago
    [deleted]
  - esseph 5mo ago
    [dead]
jesse_dot_id 5mo ago
You're a Google search away from fact checking me if you want to do that. I'm a DevOps engineer, not a C suite guy, but I tend to agree with you in general. I think there is a lot of smoke being blown into the hive around this technology but having used it extensively, and having witnessed its progression first hand in engineering, these tools are insanely useful and have made giant leaps forward in just ~4 years. Don't know if you're a believer in Moore's Law or not, but I don't think your tune is going to take anywhere near 50 years to change. I'd be surprised if it took 5 years.
- otabdeveloper4 5mo ago
  No offense, but your post reads like LLM psychosis. Mostly because you failed to understand my post at all and rushed in to defend AI's honor. (Why? I don't think AI wants or needs your oaths of loyalty.)
  - jesse_dot_id 5mo ago
    Ah yes, the mark of a cogent argument: the phantom diagnosis.
  - saulapremium 5mo ago
    >No offense Uh huh..
jayGlow 5mo ago
it looks like they have been used at least once to help develop a vaccine. they're not as significant as writing but they do seem to have their uses. https://theconversation.com/a-man-used-ai-to-help-make-a-cancer-vaccine-for-his-dog-an-oncologist-urges-caution-278735 https://theconversation.com/a-man-used-ai-to-help-make-a-can...

esseph 5mo ago

> Good lord! >I hope somebody is documenting all these bombastic LLM-related public statements. --- This has been in use for awhile. https://academic.oup.com/bib/article/26/3/bbaf263/8158336 https://academic.oup.com/bib/article/26/3/bbaf263/8158336 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12970898/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12970898/ How it gets used: https://mlconference.ai/blog/ai-in-vaccine-development/ https://mlconference.ai/blog/ai-in-vaccine-development/

otabdeveloper4 5mo ago
No, you cannot use LLMs to develop vaccines. Anybody who claims otherwise is lying to you. Also, you're confusing "AI" and LLMs.
- deleted 5mo ago
  [deleted]
- esseph 5mo ago
  [dead]

jesse_dot_id 5mo ago

You're a Google search away from fact checking me if you want to do that. I'm a DevOps engineer, not a C suite guy, but I tend to agree with you in general. I think there is a lot of smoke being blown into the hive around this technology but having used it extensively, and having witnessed its progression first hand in engineering, these tools are insanely useful and have made giant leaps forward in just ~4 years. Don't know if you're a believer in Moore's Law or not, but I don't think your tune is going to take anywhere near 50 years to change. I'd be surprised if it took 5 years.

otabdeveloper4 5mo ago
No offense, but your post reads like LLM psychosis. Mostly because you failed to understand my post at all and rushed in to defend AI's honor. (Why? I don't think AI wants or needs your oaths of loyalty.)
- jesse_dot_id 5mo ago
  Ah yes, the mark of a cogent argument: the phantom diagnosis.
- saulapremium 5mo ago
  >No offense Uh huh..

jayGlow 5mo ago

it looks like they have been used at least once to help develop a vaccine. they're not as significant as writing but they do seem to have their uses. https://theconversation.com/a-man-used-ai-to-help-make-a-cancer-vaccine-for-his-dog-an-oncologist-urges-caution-278735 https://theconversation.com/a-man-used-ai-to-help-make-a-can...