3 ms·

i legitimately cannot divine what you are saying at all with this. there are so many dangling antecedents and modifiers that it is completely impossible. and i

i legitimately cannot divine what you are saying at all with this. there are so many dangling antecedents and modifiers that it is completely impossible. and i say this out of a genuine desire to understand what your argument is, knowing full well that i likely disagree with it.

embedding-shape 5mo ago
Alright, let me explain, hopefully simpler: GP made told us their experience with working with LLMs, and some pointers to what they found to be working. The comment I replied to just says "This is astrology for devs" which basically is a cheap putdown without any reasoning nor arguments for why the commentator believes so. My comment is urging them to actually participate in the discussion, not just post their soundbite they thought of in five seconds, so HN as a whole can remain good instead of devolving into reddit (which is a tale as old as HN, I know). Hopefully it's understandable now, and hopefully you don't disagree :)
- beepbooptheory 5mo ago
  https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html > Please don't post comments saying that HN is turning into Reddit. It's a semi-noob illusion, as old as the hills
  - satvikpendem 5mo ago
    Indeed, with the corollary of, please don't write Reddit-tier comments on HN either, then one wouldn't have to say it's turning into Reddit.
    - beepbooptheory 5mo ago
      Two wrongs don't make a right, as they teach us as children.
  - embedding-shape 5mo ago
    Awesome, you did understand the reference I made, I was afraid I was too sneaky about it but seems it was just clear enough :)
    - beepbooptheory 5mo ago
      Of course! That point in the guidelines has links to some prior art in this vein. Highly recommend it for you. And please, do better next time!
      - embedding-shape 5mo ago
        Whenever I make joke reference to the guidelines, I do promise I'll attach a link to them, just to make it extra clear, thanks! :)
        beepbooptheory 5mo ago
        Thanks for caring and being respectful.
munksbeer 5mo ago
You can't be serious. It couldn't be more obvious what the poster was referring to, a drive by put-down comment with no attempt to discuss anything seriously is more highly upvoted than an objection to such a comment. What is this place for? Dang tells us, curious discussion. The guidelines explicitly state that certain comments are not in the spirit. But the community seems to have decided otherwise, which is a shame.
- deleted 5mo ago
  [deleted]
- embedding-shape 5mo ago
  Don't read too much into it, downvotes/upvotes are highly random here, saying the same thing twice will have different reactions depending on the time of day and the topic of the submission, seems certain crowds are drawn to certain topics, which isn't that surprising. I don't mind the downvotes, the points aren't really the reason I'm here anyways, I just want fun and interesting discussions with people and read other's perspectives, the points don't hinder that :)

embedding-shape 5mo ago

Alright, let me explain, hopefully simpler: GP made told us their experience with working with LLMs, and some pointers to what they found to be working. The comment I replied to just says "This is astrology for devs" which basically is a cheap putdown without any reasoning nor arguments for why the commentator believes so. My comment is urging them to actually participate in the discussion, not just post their soundbite they thought of in five seconds, so HN as a whole can remain good instead of devolving into reddit (which is a tale as old as HN, I know). Hopefully it's understandable now, and hopefully you don't disagree :)

beepbooptheory 5mo ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html > Please don't post comments saying that HN is turning into Reddit. It's a semi-noob illusion, as old as the hills
- satvikpendem 5mo ago
  Indeed, with the corollary of, please don't write Reddit-tier comments on HN either, then one wouldn't have to say it's turning into Reddit.
  - beepbooptheory 5mo ago
    Two wrongs don't make a right, as they teach us as children.
- embedding-shape 5mo ago
  Awesome, you did understand the reference I made, I was afraid I was too sneaky about it but seems it was just clear enough :)
  - beepbooptheory 5mo ago
    Of course! That point in the guidelines has links to some prior art in this vein. Highly recommend it for you. And please, do better next time!
    - embedding-shape 5mo ago
      Whenever I make joke reference to the guidelines, I do promise I'll attach a link to them, just to make it extra clear, thanks! :)
      - beepbooptheory 5mo ago
        Thanks for caring and being respectful.

munksbeer 5mo ago

You can't be serious. It couldn't be more obvious what the poster was referring to, a drive by put-down comment with no attempt to discuss anything seriously is more highly upvoted than an objection to such a comment. What is this place for? Dang tells us, curious discussion. The guidelines explicitly state that certain comments are not in the spirit. But the community seems to have decided otherwise, which is a shame.

deleted 5mo ago
[deleted]
embedding-shape 5mo ago
Don't read too much into it, downvotes/upvotes are highly random here, saying the same thing twice will have different reactions depending on the time of day and the topic of the submission, seems certain crowds are drawn to certain topics, which isn't that surprising. I don't mind the downvotes, the points aren't really the reason I'm here anyways, I just want fun and interesting discussions with people and read other's perspectives, the points don't hinder that :)