6 ms·

[flagged]

• lelanthran 5mo ago
  > I have no personal skin in the game, but OpenAI seems like the weakest player. Claude and Gemini are both blatantly better. The market doesn't necessarily reward better products or (in this case) more intelligence. If it did, I'd be a lot richer than many of the mainstream startups.
  • avazhi 5mo ago
    > The market doesn't necessarily reward better products or (in this case) more intelligence. It does when the product being sold is sold based on how intelligent (and thus how capable) it is. Unfortunately with people intelligence is merely an imprecise proxy of capability or organisational productivity.
  • NitiX 5mo ago
    [flagged]
• orwin 5mo ago
  Honestly, even if anthropic models are better than OpenAIs, I don't understand how they want to make money. In October last year, the frontier models from US companies were so much better than the cheapest models, I thought it was over, but nowadays, even smaller models perform adequately enough. I now use free models (or rather, very cheap ones) in all of my personal projects, and even though anthropic's harness is hard to replace on complex cases (it helps understand where the LLM failed better, which allows to correct the mistakes more easily), I'm pretty sure pure LLM gains are less and less with each new models.
• greatgib 5mo ago
  Anthropic models are well used for coding and similar tasks, and mostly through their own tooling as they are pretty aggressive limiting other usage. But I don't see their models being used that much through api for all the applications that are using api nowadays. Openai is the one with the easiest api to use and the more lax about it.