4 ms·
My point is they can still influence the US even if they / their money isn’t there. Do you really live in that much of a US-centric bubble where you don’t real
by hsbauauvhabzb 5mo ago
My point is they can still influence the US even if they / their money isn’t there.
Do you really live in that much of a US-centric bubble where you don’t realise outside influence exists?
- johnnyanmac 5mo ago>they can still influence the US even if they / their money isn’t there. Sure, but I wager not being in the US means less money. And thus less influence > Do you really live in that much of a US-centric bubble where you don’t realise outside influence exists? Adding any friction to their influence is a good thing, in my eyes.
- hsbauauvhabzb 5mo agoNo, your trillion dollar company invests all its money in offshore companies which just happen to be owned or controlled by you.
- johnnyanmac 5mo agoCool, more american companies to invest in.
- michaelmrose 5mo agoYou realize that there is no sort of outsized influence we couldn't declare illegal?
- hsbauauvhabzb 5mo agoI’m not sure you know how the world works lol.
- michaelmrose 5mo agoI do we are discussing whether the problem is theoretically solveable not whether it would be politically possible.
- hsbauauvhabzb 5mo agoSo in layman’s terms, you haven’t solved the problem.