4 ms·
Weird thing to say about a report which literally has the attached mathematical proof.
by nathan_compton 5mo ago
Weird thing to say about a report which literally has the attached mathematical proof.
- reactordev 5mo agoExcept its not a proof. It's an existential proof of what? Projecting points and loosing density? Nah, it's wrong. At least with Edros you could solve f(x) or not solve it (inf). You can not with this. All they did was balance a really fancy quadratic equation. The projection from C^f to R² doesn't demonstrate geometric injectivity, so nⱼ = |X| isn't established, and the bound collapses.
- nathan_compton 5mo agoYou got downvoted, but I'm a bit curious - can you elaborate on these critiques?
- deleted 5mo ago[deleted]