6 ms·

Modern Shaheds can be controlled through satellite links like StarLink, with high quality video. Also, targeting a large pile of metal in the sea should not be

• jandrewrogers 5mo ago
  This underestimates the requirements. It requires sophisticated real-time terminal guidance. This is not a cheap feature. Modern anti-ship drones dynamically select a precise point of impact based on their observation of the target to maximize probability of hitting a vulnerable spot. Especially with a weak warhead like the Shahed, most points of impact would be scratching the paint. The model you are talking about was basically how things worked in the 1970s. Technology has improved a lot over the last half century.
• nradov 5mo ago
  For now only the USA has reliable access to anything like Starlink / Starshield. Radar isn't any kind of magic solution: it has limited range and field of view.
• WatchDog 5mo ago
  Any kind of radio control should be discounted when attacking a US carrier fleet, they will just be jammed. Autonomous optically guided missiles/drones would fare better, but those are still vulnerable to being blinded by laser systems like HELIOS[0], and of course being shot down by anti air missiles or CIWS. [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Energy_Laser_with_Integrated_Optical-dazzler_and_Surveillance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Energy_Laser_with_Integra...
• deleted 5mo ago
  [deleted]