2 ms·
Perhaps actual thinking is not automatically necessary for that either! - and the LLM is proof.
by tom_ 5mo ago
Perhaps actual thinking is not automatically necessary for that either! - and the LLM is proof.
- throw310822 5mo agoThen what is thinking necessary for? Not for proving novel results; not for coding; not for writing prose; not for arguing a point; not for interpreting artworks; etc.
- rafram 5mo ago> not for writing prose; not for arguing a point; not for interpreting artworks To be fair, LLMs are pretty bad at all of these. They struggle to avoid cliches and to produce prose with actual substance (below a stylistic facade that is undeniably convincing).
- aaronbrethorst 5mo agoThey struggle to avoid cliches and to produce prose with actual substance I have bad news for you about the writings of most Ph.D.s and University professors...