3 ms·
Naive at best; Your statement doesn’t exclude greed as a driving factor. The legality of actions have nothing to do with the morality underlying them.
by G0lg0thvn 5mo ago
Naive at best; Your statement doesn’t exclude greed as a driving factor. The legality of actions have nothing to do with the morality underlying them.
- nradov 5mo agoThere's nothing immoral here. Shareholders aren't morally obligated to provide extra jobs for people who aren't adding value.
- G0lg0thvn 5mo agoGreat strawman; keep trucking I never said anything about obligation. Of course they’re not obliged to provide extra jobs, but it is a moral obligation to treat those whom you employ with dignity. I would love to understand what you actually define as a moral obligation considering your vacuous response.