3 ms·
I guess at some point we will have lawyers, attorneys and judges using this stuff ... at the point lawyers will become kinda "seo"/"copywriter" experts on how t
by vb-8448 5mo ago
I guess at some point we will have lawyers, attorneys and judges using this stuff ... at the point lawyers will become kinda "seo"/"copywriter" experts on how to better trick the others LLM.
- forshaper 5mo agoAlmost makes me want to get a law degree.
- nozzlegear 5mo agoI mean, the laws are written down somewhere though. A human can still look at the actual law and surmise that the AI is feeding them bullshit.
- macintux 5mo agoI think the problem is that laws overlap, with decades of case law clarifying their interactions. Looking at one law probably isn't enough to determine whether an LLM is lying to you.
- dyauspitr 5mo agoIn that situation I would trust an LLM over a person. It’s a digest and review problem.
- einpoklum 5mo agoHuman judges today often don't bother to look at "the actual law" and surmise that the human is feeding them bullshit.
- gnerd00 5mo agothe look on the face of the Court administrator upon hearing someone describe the "paperclip maximizer" problem.. ominous!
- giobox 5mo ago> I guess at some point we will have lawyers, attorneys and judges using this stuff We are already well beyond this point. Look already at the number of cases around the world where lawyers have provided documents to the court with hallucinated case citations.