4 ms·
Heh, a place where I worked some guy who left kept committing code for months (he went to work for a company we were a vendor for). Some of my teammates knew an
by zeafoamrun 5mo ago
Heh, a place where I worked some guy who left kept committing code for months (he went to work for a company we were a vendor for). Some of my teammates knew and just thought it was no big deal, he was fixing bugs and adding features.
The color the director turned when he found out!! Oh man.
- thierrydamiba 5mo agoThis story deserves a movie, or at least a long video essay! Haven’t laughed this hard in a long time.
- tosti 5mo agoIIRC 50 Shades had a case of "remember me, the woman you fired? I talked to your boss' boss and I'm your boss now"
- lukan 5mo agoYou might enjoy this story then. 2 guys at apple continue to finish and ship their product after being laid off .. https://www.pacifict.com/story/ https://www.pacifict.com/story/
- pretzel5297 5mo agoso he was doing free labor for your company? What's he getting out of that?
- michaelt 5mo agohe went to work for a company we were a vendor for Sounds like he's getting paid to work on the same thing by a slightly different stakeholder. I'd happily pay $$$$$$ to hire someone with commit access to Cloudflare, AWS or Google's codebase who could fix the goddamn bugs, let alone add new features.
- ErroneousBosh 5mo ago> Sounds like he's getting paid to work on the same thing by a slightly different stakeholder. This honestly sounds like the sort of thing I'd sit down with the employee, their new employer, and various "Compliance Team" members, and firm up a bit. Sounds good for everyone. We get our bugs fixed, $vendor gets to say "Well we have this thing that was developed in-house for BoshNet, that might solve your problem too, it's going to cost you <some comical amount>", and everyone's happy.
- lazide 5mo agoNo company with a legal rep is going to be happy with that situation - ever. Who even owns the code the person is working on? Who is responsible when it goes wrong?
- panflute 5mo agoNever happy is a bit of an exaggeration. SYSV UNIX had all of these risks and various legal departments went through them as they do regularly for more typical types of research.
- lazide 5mo agoWhen it was explicit, and part of the relationship, sure. Because those questions aren’t questions.
- ErroneousBosh 5mo agoWhich is why I said you'd sit everyone down and thrash it out.
- pbronez 5mo agoThat’s the “firming up” bit. You have a contract that deems the code “work for hire” even though the money flow is wonky. Legally the guy is like any 1099.
- oniony 5mo agohttps://www.nucalc.com/Story/ https://www.nucalc.com/Story/
- mylastattempt 5mo agoJust finished reading, love these kind of stories. Thanks for sharing
- pbronez 5mo ago> We wanted to release a Windows version as part of Windows 98, but sadly, Microsoft has effective building security.
- odysseus 5mo agoWas his name … Milton?
- discordance 5mo ago"We fixed the glitch"
- ErroneousBosh 5mo agoI have door codes and passwords for a major organisation that I last worked for somewhere in the region of 20 years ago. They haven't rotated a damn thing. I still know people who work there, and I guess technically I still support things for them in an informal question-over-a-pint kind of way, but damn me, put in some effort guys.