2 ms·
> particularly because it has original quotes. I'm not saying the quotes are fake, that would be horrific. I'm saying the rest of the article appears to have h
by bonsai_spool 5mo ago
> particularly because it has original quotes.
I'm not saying the quotes are fake, that would be horrific. I'm saying the rest of the article appears to have had minimal human intervention.
- jvanderbot 5mo agoAt some point, however distasteful to the naturalists, do we accept that writing with AI is still writing? There will be an arms race the way there was moving from banner ads -> whatever hellscape we have today ...
- asdff 5mo agoIt's the same as copying and pasting the wikipedia article and calling that your article. We all can generate our own slop if we want. If all you are peddling is slop, you are peddling nothing I can't get myself.
- ameliaquining 5mo agoThen why did you point to the em-dash in the quote as evidence of AI authorship?