3 ms·
Digg tries again, this time as an AI news aggregator
- rcakebread 6mo agoHow the mighty have slopped.
- add-sub-mul-div 6mo agoThey keep trying to pull this brand name out of the graveyard but it makes people think of an era when the internet wasn't slop. That can only work against it in 2026.
- dbbk 6mo agoI don't even understand why they had to give up on the old platform and especially why so quickly. It can't have cost much money to run. They would have known it would take time to rebuild an audience base.
- jpalawaga 6mo agoHonestly they should go in the other direction. Real people, real conversations. Upload an ID or a CC transaction or something in order to prove your identity, and require re-ups every few years. the downside is no anonymity. The upside is, no astroturf, no bots, no nothing. Or maybe not 'none' but 'greatly reduced'. That's actually a community I might be enthused about participating in. Sort of like HN, where a lot of people use their real names. The problem is how you bootstrap it. People need a good carrot to embrace the stick.
- rationalist 6mo agoAs much as I dislike the idea, someone has to try it first, and other social media has been done to death, so I'm inclined to agree with you. Disclaimer, I paid them $5 dollars for an account last year when they restarted, and never did anything with it.
- mahgnous 6mo ago[dead]
- b3ing 6mo agoWhy would anyone care what the top 1000 voices in ai talk about? And it’s the users job to sift through that garbage? This is like digg v3 all over again which killed the original site.
- marstall 6mo agoi've actually been wanting something like this. issue seems to be there is way off the site? top story about thinking machines has no way to click through to original link AFAICS
- ThePowerOfFuet 6mo agoSo, Kagi News, but worse? No thanks. At least Kagi's interests are aligned with mine.