3 ms·
Should be banned. These companies are destroying a piece of the environment that belongs to all of us - the night sky.
by SilverElfin 5mo ago
Should be banned. These companies are destroying a piece of the environment that belongs to all of us - the night sky.
- amelius 5mo agoLet's ban ads too, while we're at it.
- Keyframe 5mo agoWhere do we sign?
- deleted 5mo ago[deleted]
- Bender 5mo agoAlong that line people should look into BUG ratings [1] for outdoor lighting, especially city operated lights. [1] [1] - https://www.landscapeforms.com/ideas/bug-rating-system-101 https://www.landscapeforms.com/ideas/bug-rating-system-101
- polski-g 5mo agoIf you people were in charge in the 1800s, you'd ban the industrial revolution and we'd still need slaves for everything.
- sedawkgrep 5mo agoYou don’t think there might be a better solution than having a dozen or more companies all launching thousands of satellites which all perform the same function?
- bobsmooth 5mo agoIs there one organization you trust to run the space internet for everyone on earth?
- sedawkgrep 5mo agoMaybe the entire approach is inappropriate.
- shafyy 5mo agoJesus dude
- thejazzman 5mo ago[flagged]
- SilverElfin 5mo agoRight, because not wanting the night skies polluted for someone else’s profits, with no fair compensation to me, is somehow the same as banning the Industrial Revolution? What exactly are we not able to do with terrestrial internet?
- tristanj 5mo agoBanning Starlink is inadequate and won't change anything. China is building its own larger version with 25,000+ satellites. Russia is building its own network. The EU is building its own network.
- shafyy 5mo ago[flagged]