3 ms·
It’s already here the question is just to what extent? Are google search results modifying your software at runtime? Take or agent chat for example, the outpu
by aleksiy123 6mo ago
It’s already here the question is just to what extent?
Are google search results modifying your software at runtime?
Take or agent chat for example, the output text is a ui, agents can generate charts and even constrained ui elements.
Isn’t that created and adapted at run time?
If you mean like agents live modifying your code. I think that’s pretty much here as well. Can read the logs and send prs.
The only thing is how fast that loop will execute from days or hours to mins or seconds, and what validation gates it needs to pass.
My git repo is pretty much self modifying personal software at this point, that I interface through the ide chat window.
But I don’t think we will ever lose the intermediary deterministic language (code) between the llm and the execution engine.
It would be prohibitively expensive to run everything through models all the time.
But I am starting to think we need a more precise language than English when talking with LLMs. That can do both precision and ambiguity when you need either.
- jmaw 6mo agoSome kind of "code", you could say
- aleksiy123 6mo agoYes but more declarative vs imperative. I say what the llm says how.
- pishpash 6mo agoNot that long ago the workflow was to turn code comments into code. Maybe leave some comments as is now.
- pishpash 6mo agoSounds like assemblers bemoaning loss of control to C. The solution was inline assembly...