3 ms·
So substitute another phrase, if you prefer. It doesn't change the logic. "Specifically, we define a formal world where bungling is defined as inconsistencies
by MarkusQ 6mo ago
So substitute another phrase, if you prefer. It doesn't change the logic.
"Specifically, we define a formal world where bungling is defined as inconsistencies between a computable LLM and a computable ground truth function. By employing results from learning theory, we show that LLMs cannot learn all the computable functions and will therefore inevitably bungle if used as general problem solvers."
- red75prime 6mo agoTheir diagonalization argument applies to any system that uses finite training data. Calling such a system "LLM" is an (unintentional) red herring.
- MarkusQ 6mo agoYeah. IMHO this is the more serious objection.