3 ms·
If by "sharks" you mean "inside traders" then yes.
by josefritzishere 6mo ago
If by "sharks" you mean "inside traders" then yes.
- skinfaxi 6mo agoI took it to be like a pool shark. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_cue_sports_terms#shark https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_cue_sports_terms#s...
- josefritzishere 6mo agoYes, that'd be the grammatically correct use. But Insider trading has been rampant on the "prediction markets". In short, it's a scam, because gambling is always a scam. https://fortune.com/2026/04/26/prediction-markets-insider-trading-illegal-kalshi-polymarket-robin-hanson-economist/ https://fortune.com/2026/04/26/prediction-markets-insider-tr...
- orwin 6mo agoNot only that, huge UMA tokens holders can also rig some bets on a technicality without much effort, especially since big UMA token holders seems to know each others. If you bet against Zelansky wearing a suit to meet Trump, and that by all account, he seemed to be wearing a suit, but you don't want to loose the bet, the "Oracle"/UMA holders can decide that it wasn't, in fact, a suit, and your bet will win.