4 ms·

Even taking into account the fact that they are billing at 75% discount it's still quite cheaper

• amelius 5mo ago
  Aren't they all billing at discount?
  • stavros 5mo ago
    Anthropic's and OpenAI's costs seem to include a fairly ok margin, from the very fourth hand info I have.
    • vdfs 5mo ago
      In total, how many hands do you have?
      • utopiah 5mo ago
        Those aren't their hands.
      • gessha 5mo ago
        Enough to reach the bottom of the rabbit hole.
        • rzzzt 5mo ago
          Counting turtles on the way down?
      • sumeno 5mo ago
        If I was a betting man I'd bet that at least one of those hands is an LLM
  • locknitpicker 5mo ago
    > Aren't they all billing at discount? Microsoft just announced the availability of OpenAI GPT-5.5, which they are charging 30x for it. In contrast, they charge 7.5x for Claude Opus 4.6 and 1x for OpenAI GPT-5.4 Check out the token-based pricing, and compare GPT-5.5 with all other models. https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/reference/copilot-billing/models-and-pricing#user-content-fn-1 https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/reference/copilot-billing...
    • giwook 5mo ago
      Actually it is $30 for GPT 5.5, $25 for both Opus 4.6 and 4.7. If you're referring to the multipliers that are used for subscription-based usage, GPT 5.5 is not available yet (according to https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/reference/copilot-billing/model-multipliers-for-annual-plans https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/reference/copilot-billing...) and Opus will be at 27x at the end of the month. When I check GH Copilot right now, it looks like Opus 4.7 multiplier was increased to 15x (I think it was 6x just a few days ago) but 4.6 is still at 3x. But these relatively cheap multipliers exist only until the end of the month.