4 ms·
They explained in detail why they felt they had to talk about it. They think there's no safe deployment strategy other than fixing all the vulnerabilities it's
by SpicyLemonZest 6mo ago
They explained in detail why they felt they had to talk about it. They think there's no safe deployment strategy other than fixing all the vulnerabilities it's likely to find, and there are too many such vulnerabilities for them to fix without getting help from a substantial number of trusted partners.
- b00ty4breakfast 6mo agoAll due respect, that's the biggest crock I've ever heard in my life.
- SpicyLemonZest 6mo agoI understand where you're coming from. I can imagine myself reacting similarly if HP announced that they've invented a printer so powerful that it can print documents you don't have access to. But I don't know how to engage with this response, other than to say that Anthropic's story is plausible to me and everyone I know in either AI or security.
- habinero 6mo agoI work in security, and I think it's marketing BS meant to drive FOMO until proven otherwise. You cannot take any claims from these people seriously, they lie constantly.
- DANmode 6mo ago> I work in security Doing what? School admins work in security.
- habinero 6mo agoYour mom, primarily. Also general blue team shit and appsec.
- DANmode 6mo agolol. Aren’t you convinced by the posts by security researchers (and more to the point, non-security-researchers) claiming semiautonomous (or better) 0day discovery with these tools? Haven’t seen enough of them? Help me understand.
- habinero 6mo agoWhy? I'm clearly not going to convince you lol. You convince me I should.