3 ms·
Jobs was right. Gates was wrong
- deleted 5mo ago[deleted]
- superxpro12 5mo agoThis seems incredibly obvious to me I guess, because its an industry standard play. Establish marketshare, then monetize. And right now, the industry is caught in this feedback loop that seems to inflate the stock prices of everyone involved. AI needs gpu's, which grows the gpu sector, which AI needs, because if its userbase. And then it buys more gpus. The growth has to stop at SOME point... I'm waiting for a massive shoe to drop on token pricing. It's unsustainable.
- goodmythical 5mo agoPublished today, leading with "Recently, I ran an AI model locally and reached a conclusion that is hard to ignore: the major LLM providers are probably operating with substantial subsidies to sustain their services at current prices." is wild. How do you get all the way to running a local model without having heard that this is the case? Like...it's so well documented...I wonder if author knows that a portion of the subsidy is that the models are being trained on free, cheap, and chat models...
- lrsaturnino 5mo agoThanks - yes, I agree, and already I knew this was a thing. I just haven't yet concretely made the actual math, and it left me baffled - Anthropic and OpenAI are charging 1/3 of the COST tops.
- goodmythical 5mo agoAh, yes, it is always interesting to see loss leaders and just general revenue wizardry that can be accomplished at scale. Things like "It can be more cost effective to take on debt than to earn additional revenue". Imagine how much it costs Alphabet to run hundreds of thousands of terabytes of not only streaming but transcoding every single day for youtube and you get a similar sense of "holy shit where is the money coming from".
- avmich 5mo agoThe quote at the beginning is of Alan Kay though. https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Alan_Kay https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Alan_Kay
- lrsaturnino 5mo agoThanks - fixed.
- hyperhello 5mo ago[dead]