3 ms·

You have to be joking. The media is almost daily full of China scares. Also, the comments here are not talking about who started this war, with the GPU sanctio

You have to be joking. The media is almost daily full of China scares. Also, the comments here are not talking about who started this war, with the GPU sanctions and the arrest of the daughter of Huawei's founder. Does it mean the Chinese are the good guys? No, because there are not good guys, but there is certainly a side that is extremely aggressive an can't conceive that others can have their own interests. And it's not the Chinese.

bit-anarchist 5mo ago
> The media is almost daily full of China scares That gets repeated a lot. Is there any source? > there is certainly a side that is extremely aggressive an can't conceive that others can have their own interests. And it's not the Chinese. Ask the Taiwanese about it. Or most countries dealing with border disputes with the PRC.
- Daishiman 5mo ago
  > That gets repeated a lot. Is there any source? Have you not been reading The Economist for the past 20 years of the WSJ since its acquisition by Rupert Murdoch? They've been predicting the downlfall of China every other month.
  - Saline9515 5mo ago
    Can you point to this month's article then so we have a sample?
    - Daishiman 5mo ago
      Nah I prefer to discuss with people who have some basic literacy or googling skills because if you search for "economist predicting the fall of china" you'll find both their articles and the commentary surrounding it. It ain't that hard!
      - Saline9515 5mo ago
        I'm asking because I read regularly the Economist and don't feel that it's a true statement. For instance, the latest Chaguan column is quite balanced: https://www.economist.com/china/2026/04/27/xi-jinping-wants-china-to-read-more-as-long-as-its-the-right-books https://www.economist.com/china/2026/04/27/xi-jinping-wants-... So yeah, if you have wold claims, you better back them with sources.
        culi 5mo ago
        I also regularly keep up with The Economist and other western news outlets and I completely agree with GP's impression that we see a "China is doomed" opinion piece every other month. Same with geopolitical youtubers. Obviously none of us are committed enough to this internet discussion to do a formal study to prove our impressions but I think the majority of regular readers would also agree. Asking for sources for what is common knowledge is just a silly way to shut down discussion instead of engaging with it
        Saline9515 5mo ago
        I asked for a single article representing this point of view. If it is so common, it should be easy to find? No?
        culi 5mo ago
        Yes, you would have a very easy time finding one.
        Saline9515 5mo ago
        If you can't show any proof or even circumstantial evidence of your theory, it's worthless and the Economist is not a China-doomer paper. The reality is that it's a lie and the Economist is quite balanced about China (even while they are banned from publishing there!). For instance, their latest cover was quite positive about the country: https://www.economist.com/leaders/2026/04/01/how-china-hopes-to-win-from-the-war https://www.economist.com/leaders/2026/04/01/how-china-hopes...
- RobertoG 5mo ago
  The Taiwanese? This is actually a perfect example of what I was saying. Talking about 'Taiwan' and 'border disputes with the PRC' meanwhile the USA is doing a maritime blockade of Cuba and Iran. And that it's without talking about bombing countries or military deployed thousand of miles away from their borders, of God forbid, unconditional support to Israel, who just displaced one and a half million people. But, let's forget about all those small details, don't you see how the Chinese are very bad?
  - bit-anarchist 5mo ago
    Whataboutism. You said that only USA couldn't care for other countries' interests, so I showed China doing the same. To parody you: "But, let's forget about all those small details, don't you see how the Americans are very bad?"
    - ch4s3 5mo ago
      I like you already.
Levitz 5mo ago
>but there is certainly a side that is extremely aggressive an can't conceive that others can have their own interests. And it's not the Chinese. It's not the Chinese? You sure? There's probably nobody more economically aggressive in the planet and they just threw a hissy fit at the EU the other day for doing something they've been doing since forever. I care not for "the media", I care that I don't have enough fingers to count the amount of people trying to justify this in this very comment section. I'm sure western media is not favorable to Chinese interests, I'd be utterly baffled if Chinese media was favorable to western interests. I do not expect public sentiment to follow a party line because we are better than that, but I do expect a certain reticence to go all out and justify opposition in intellectually rotten ways.

bit-anarchist 5mo ago

> The media is almost daily full of China scares That gets repeated a lot. Is there any source? > there is certainly a side that is extremely aggressive an can't conceive that others can have their own interests. And it's not the Chinese. Ask the Taiwanese about it. Or most countries dealing with border disputes with the PRC.

Daishiman 5mo ago
> That gets repeated a lot. Is there any source? Have you not been reading The Economist for the past 20 years of the WSJ since its acquisition by Rupert Murdoch? They've been predicting the downlfall of China every other month.
- Saline9515 5mo ago
  Can you point to this month's article then so we have a sample?
  - Daishiman 5mo ago
    Nah I prefer to discuss with people who have some basic literacy or googling skills because if you search for "economist predicting the fall of china" you'll find both their articles and the commentary surrounding it. It ain't that hard!
    - Saline9515 5mo ago
      I'm asking because I read regularly the Economist and don't feel that it's a true statement. For instance, the latest Chaguan column is quite balanced: https://www.economist.com/china/2026/04/27/xi-jinping-wants-china-to-read-more-as-long-as-its-the-right-books https://www.economist.com/china/2026/04/27/xi-jinping-wants-... So yeah, if you have wold claims, you better back them with sources.
      - culi 5mo ago
        I also regularly keep up with The Economist and other western news outlets and I completely agree with GP's impression that we see a "China is doomed" opinion piece every other month. Same with geopolitical youtubers. Obviously none of us are committed enough to this internet discussion to do a formal study to prove our impressions but I think the majority of regular readers would also agree. Asking for sources for what is common knowledge is just a silly way to shut down discussion instead of engaging with it
        Saline9515 5mo ago
        I asked for a single article representing this point of view. If it is so common, it should be easy to find? No?
        culi 5mo ago
        Yes, you would have a very easy time finding one.
        Saline9515 5mo ago
        If you can't show any proof or even circumstantial evidence of your theory, it's worthless and the Economist is not a China-doomer paper. The reality is that it's a lie and the Economist is quite balanced about China (even while they are banned from publishing there!). For instance, their latest cover was quite positive about the country: https://www.economist.com/leaders/2026/04/01/how-china-hopes-to-win-from-the-war https://www.economist.com/leaders/2026/04/01/how-china-hopes...
RobertoG 5mo ago
The Taiwanese? This is actually a perfect example of what I was saying. Talking about 'Taiwan' and 'border disputes with the PRC' meanwhile the USA is doing a maritime blockade of Cuba and Iran. And that it's without talking about bombing countries or military deployed thousand of miles away from their borders, of God forbid, unconditional support to Israel, who just displaced one and a half million people. But, let's forget about all those small details, don't you see how the Chinese are very bad?
- bit-anarchist 5mo ago
  Whataboutism. You said that only USA couldn't care for other countries' interests, so I showed China doing the same. To parody you: "But, let's forget about all those small details, don't you see how the Americans are very bad?"
  - ch4s3 5mo ago
    I like you already.

Levitz 5mo ago

>but there is certainly a side that is extremely aggressive an can't conceive that others can have their own interests. And it's not the Chinese. It's not the Chinese? You sure? There's probably nobody more economically aggressive in the planet and they just threw a hissy fit at the EU the other day for doing something they've been doing since forever. I care not for "the media", I care that I don't have enough fingers to count the amount of people trying to justify this in this very comment section. I'm sure western media is not favorable to Chinese interests, I'd be utterly baffled if Chinese media was favorable to western interests. I do not expect public sentiment to follow a party line because we are better than that, but I do expect a certain reticence to go all out and justify opposition in intellectually rotten ways.