3 ms·
Exposing Floating Point – Bartosz Ciechanowski (2019)
- 9dev 5mo agoFor a short moment I got excited he may have started again… this post needs a [2019] :-(
- saagarjha 5mo agoFixed
- macintux 5mo agoIs there a reason to believe he’s stopped? The articles are clearly very labor/time-intensive, so the current lag isn’t all that unusual.
- 9dev 5mo agoWell, Bartosz used to publish 1–5 articles per year, but hasn't published any this or last year. I assume he's just got other things to do in his life, which is absolutely fair and I'm grateful for every one of the articles we got gifted and all—but at the very least he is taking a pause right now.
- deleted 5mo ago[deleted]
- rurban 5mo agotcc also supports a binary float extension. https://github.com/TinyCC/tinycc/blob/9b8765d8baaeb2a16112d68cf9defd4b804b0dc9/tests/tests2/70_floating_point_literals.c#L57 https://github.com/TinyCC/tinycc/blob/9b8765d8baaeb2a16112d6... long double la0 = 0B.110101100P12L;
- throw0101a 5mo agoMeta: with regards to significant digits, it may depend on application, but this article reminded me on NASA's 'take' on π (pi): > To start, let me answer your question directly. For JPL's highest accuracy calculations, which are for interplanetary navigation, we use 3.141592653589793. Let's look at this a little more closely to understand why we don't use more decimal places. […] > 3. Let's go to the largest size there is: the known universe. The radius of the universe is about 46 billion light years. Now let me ask (and answer!) a different question: How many digits of pi would we need to calculate the circumference of a circle with a radius of 46 billion light years to an accuracy equal to the diameter of a hydrogen atom, the simplest atom? It turns out that 37 decimal places (38 digits, including the number 3 to the left of the decimal point) would be quite sufficient. […] * https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/edu/news/how-many-decimals-of-pi-do-we-really-need/ https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/edu/news/how-many-decimals-of-pi-do...
- bombcar 5mo agoDigital precision quickly outstrips accuracy in any number of things - eg digital calipers that read down to the ten thousands of an inch on a device that isn’t accurate to a thousandth.
- ua709 5mo agoTotally agree but for calculations the rules can be a bit different because error can accumulate and computers add lots of numbers really quickly.
- adampunk 5mo ago>3.141592653589793 Use this for sin or cosine with large arguments and tell me how that goes!
- ronin_niron 5mo ago[dead]
- amelius 5mo agoThis website needs an update for the quantization techniques in DL.
- gozzoo 5mo agohere it is - https://ngrok.com/blog/quantization https://ngrok.com/blog/quantization