>Still, what if they offered it based on gender, religious belief, or race? Would that look just as good or bad of an offer. Those would be illegal. Based on a

>Still, what if they offered it based on gender, religious belief, or race? Would that look just as good or bad of an offer. Those would be illegal. Based on age + tenure is not. Simple as that But in terms of optics, I think this comes out positively. They're basically letting people retire early with a generous buyout offer that they are not required to take instead of just laying these people off with or without severance, which they'd be within their legal rights to do