4 ms·
That only says those that fall for it might pay more. It doesn’t explain why so many more fall for it.
by MBCook 6mo ago
That only says those that fall for it might pay more.
It doesn’t explain why so many more fall for it.
- palmotea 6mo ago> It doesn’t explain why so many more fall for it. It's pretty easy: he started out trying to create a "hot girl" influencer, then refined that. It could be his starting point was biased towards filling a certain type of conservative fantasy, but wasn't as easily adaptable to progressives. For instance: it could be that lonely straight progressive men are more neurotic about their sexuality, and thus less-likely to respond positively to a bikini model picture, even if the "model" is flattering their political ideology. Also there's been a demographic divergence, and young women are much more liberal than men, which means there's less of a supply of "hot girl" conservatives and more unfulfilled demand for them. I suspect the progressive version of this is something a lot less discoverable by a random slop-making foreign man.
- java-man 6mo ago"Progressive fantasy" would be AOC and Bernie, and we already have that in real life.
- palmotea 6mo ago> "Progressive fantasy" would be AOC and Bernie, and we already have that in real life. That's not the kind of fantasy I'm talking about. I'm talking about the kind of fantasy person that could cause a progressive to feel some pull towards a para-social relationship. That kind of thing was obviously at play with this character. I don't think you're going to get that from a politician.