3 ms·
I was thinking about the upcoming regulation about replaceable batteries in the EU, and couldn't help but think that if I were Apple's CEO this would be a great
by dsign 6mo ago
I was thinking about the upcoming regulation about replaceable batteries in the EU, and couldn't help but think that if I were Apple's CEO this would be a great time to make an orderly exit. Make no mistake, I'm not a fan of i-Devices' non-replaceable batteries, but I can't remember a single device with a lid for batteries on the back that was aesthetically in the same league as an iPhone.
- stetrain 6mo agoAs far as I know it should be pretty easy for Apple to comply with the regulation. The battery needs to be replaceable with standard or freely available tools and without adhesives. Many of Apple’s devices already meet this standard. Edit: I'm not sure on the adhesives part. Apple uses an electrically-releasable adhesive in some of their newer products. The MacBook Neo doesn't use battery adhesive at all. There are considerations in the law for water proofing, device safety, and battery durability (maintaining 80% capacity at 1000 cycles, which Apple already does). They do not require a pop open battery door on every device like it's 2005 again. Apple already provides repair tools, guides, and replacement parts both to end users and third party technicians. These regulations are complicated, but they aren't new and Apple isn't being blindsided with some catastrophe here.
- hilariously 6mo agoWhat? Which? Huh? Absolutely not. So many of them have adhesives I dont think almost any of them meet your criteria.
- simonw 6mo agoI don't think any of the iPhone or iPads do. Their design is pretty tightly coupled to weird shaped, permanently attached batteries, from what I've heard.
- stetrain 6mo agoI don't know whether the newer electrically-releasing battery adhesives would count, but they do allow cleanly removing and replacing the battery without proprietary tools.
- naravara 6mo agoThey’re not proprietary but some of them are expensive and somewhat specialized. I don’t think it’ll be really economical for most normal people to self-service many repairs, but it’ll be very viable to have a corner hardware store that can do it for you for cheap. Self-servicing battery replacements ought to be doable with an eyeglass screwdriver though.
- criddell 6mo agoI've read that Apple's products fall outside the scope of the regulation because their product batteries can do 1000 cycles and still hit the 80% benchmark.
- bombcar 6mo agoEven if they can't right now, they certainly can by downrating them a bit. I'd still like to see them comply with the spirit and make it easy to replace.
- otterley 6mo agoAnd what, exactly, is your knowledge based on? I take it you've designed and shipped a working phone that meets IP68 standards for water intrusion?
- stetrain 6mo agoReading some articles about the EU law, which is more complicated than the seemingly popular interpretation that all phones are now going to have tool-free battery doors on the back like it's 2005 again.
- gyomu 6mo agoThe battery thing doesn’t apply to water resistant devices, so doesn’t matter for iPhone/Apple Watch. There’s rumors that upcoming iPad models are water resistant, I suspect that’s the motivation for it.
- cyberge99 6mo agoIt’s no secret that Apple has for decades wanted a device with no ports at all.
- cryptonym 6mo agoI does apply. Battery should be sold for 5 years+ after EoS and it still must be replaceable without proprietary tools, nor proprietary parts.
- bombcar 6mo agoOr out-of-warranty replacement should be available for a rate not to be above X% of the original price for 5+ years after last sale. Of course the latter can be gamed where they refuse to replace the battery on a cracked phone, even though it could be done and probably work.
- master-lincoln 6mo ago> The battery thing doesn’t apply to water resistant devices, so doesn’t matter for iPhone/Apple Watch. I think that is not true. If you look at article 11.2 b it talks about "appliances specifically designed to operate primarily in an environment that is regularly subject to splashing water, water streams or water immersion, and that are intended to be washable or rinseable" I don't think that applies to Apple devices. Also these special devices still need a battery replaceable by a professional. https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/PE-2-2023-INIT/en/pdf https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/PE-2-2023-INIT...
- bombcar 6mo agoApple Watch seems to apply (it's a dive watch at least sometimes) - but it would be a change to the iPhone to make it a dive phone. Unlikely they'd want to develop all that just to avoid some battery redesign - the phones last so long now that they should have some headroom.
- ubercore 6mo agoDidn't the Apple Faithful say the same for usb-c?
- bombcar 6mo agoThe Apple Faithful will always defend whatever Apple does, it's not terribly useful to listen to them. It's the Apple Faithful who criticize Apple that are worth listening to.
- alexjplant 6mo agoLightning is a superior physical design to USB-C (can't speak to the electrical part). Much like every major tech battle in history, however [1], the worse solution won because of ubiquity. I'm not particularly thrilled because I've had a USB-C connector irretrievably break off in a port once on a laptop but I'll make that trade for being able to use a single cable for all of my devices. - Not an "Apple Faithful" [1] VHS vs Beta, Doom vs Marathon, Zergling vs human, etc
- ubercore 6mo agoI've never had trouble with usb-c, but have had lightning connectors short out and burn one of the leads, or stop working from dust. Not sure I'd say one is better than the other, but individual experience can really vary on these kind of things. Tough to say one is clearly better imo.
- bombcar 6mo agoMy experience that lighting was by far the best - when everything lightning I had was made by Apple. As things became available in the after-market quality began to vary. My biggest issue with USB-C right now is I have some devices that need a really long "tongue" and I can't find a cable with such.
- ubercore 6mo agoYeah it seems to be really up to individual experience. I had two apple-made lightning cables that shorted and burned out the leads on the male end of the connector.
- draw_down 6mo ago[dead]
- taffydavid 6mo agoTo be clear, replaceable battery doesn't mean a lid like phones used to have. It means that you should be able to take the device apart with simple tools and remove the battery and pop in another one. It actually probably affects other phone companies more than it affects Apple, as some of the others have very poor repairability
- blackguardx 6mo agoThe iPhone 4 was easily disassembled with screwdrivers...
- someguyiguess 6mo ago> "easily" Yoikes!
- encom 6mo agoYea, the dog shit pentalobe screwdrivers.
- otterley 6mo agoThe iPhone 4 was not water resistant. I remember owning one and being absolutely freaked out about it getting wet. Talk about an expensive paperweight.
- MaximusXY 5mo agoHey... Blackguardx, your name reminds of someone Ive seen before. Do you happen to play a mobile game named Duet? Also yea lol, I literally disassembled mine after it stopped working (I do with lots of my electronics)
- mrweasel 6mo agoThe Microsoft Lumia 540 looks remarkably like a modern phone still and it had a fairly easily replaceable battery, because it allowed you to replace the back cover. There's also the Lumia 920, which is arguably a nicer looking phone than anything Apple current have, also have a fairly easily replaceable battery, requiring you to remove just two screws.