4 ms·
I'm not saying it's worthless for yourself, it's worthless to me as a viewer. AI content is great for your own usage, but there is no point posting and distribu
by Gigachad 7mo ago
I'm not saying it's worthless for yourself, it's worthless to me as a viewer. AI content is great for your own usage, but there is no point posting and distributing AI generation.
I could have generated my own content, so just send the prompt rather than the output to save everyone time.
- dolebirchwood 7mo agoAnd when the distilled knowledge/product is the result of multiple prompts, revisions, and reiterations? Shall we send all 30+ of those as well so as to reproduce each step along the way?
- zulban 7mo agoMaybe reread my comment. Would you not want to see a mount Everest sized Lego cat? Even if it were my cat? Again - your quip sounds good but when you think about it, it's flatly wrong.
- Fraterkes 7mo agoThis doesn't make sense, if I want to see a lego-cat slopimage I can just prompt a model myself (and have it be of my own cat). There's no reason for you to be involved in any part of that process, because the point of this stuff is that you are not doing anything.
- zulban 7mo agoThe claim is that people don't / shouldn't want to see something if humans can't be bothered to make it. I provided a counter example. So the claim is nonsense.